The Midgard Saga II [Concluded]

**Privateerkev** · 08-13-2008, 16:19

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

No, you can't lynch me just because I want to fight and probably die in a Holmgang.

I can lynch you for putting more townies at risk. Sorry, but this game is bigger than just one person's desire to Holmgang.

**GeneralHankerchief** · 08-13-2008, 16:20

You still don't get it, do you?

**Privateerkev** · 08-13-2008, 16:22

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

You still don't get it, do you?

I "get it" just fine. But you simply don't like my stance.

*edit*

Actually ET, watering down the challenges is good for Motep. Keeps him from getting picked. And GH is as good a target as any. Plus, he said he wants to Holmgang...

**Ferret** · 08-13-2008, 16:22

Challenge:GH

I don't care if it makes PK think I'm Jotun, holmganging is unique to this game and looks fun.

**Csargo** · 08-13-2008, 16:23

Originally Posted by Privateerkev

I can lynch you for putting more townies at risk. Sorry, but this game is bigger than just one person's desire to Holmgang.

**Privateerkev** · 08-13-2008, 16:28

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

-edit- No, obviously, you don't get it. Maybe you will after I die.

Well, I am "daring" to send the pitchforks after you for Holmganging. Now, what are you going to do about it? Yell at me to shut up again?

Originally Posted by Ichigo

I meant it as calling for a lynch. We use "I will lynch you" and "I will call for your lynching" quite interchangebly. But if you want me to be more specific, I will. If GH insists on thinning out the townie herd with pointless Holmgangs, I will vote for him to be lynched.

Despite all the hostility and harsh language he throws in my direction.

**Csargo** · 08-13-2008, 16:30

Just remember what you guys did last time.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

**Privateerkev** · 08-13-2008, 16:33

Originally Posted by Ichigo

Just remember what you guys did last time.

CA acted wierd. He bounced his vote around a whole lot for weak reasons. On D1, with so little evidence, he seemed like the best lynch choice. This ended up being a major error on our part but at the time it seemed like the best thing to do.

People with power-town roles need to keep in mind that we don't know who they are. So if they act suspicious, they are going to be voted on.

**Csargo** · 08-13-2008, 16:48

Originally Posted by Privateerkev

CA acted wierd. He bounced his vote around a whole lot for weak reasons. On D1, with so little evidence, he seemed like the best lynch choice. This ended up being a major error on our part but at the time it seemed like the best thing to do.

People with power-town roles need to keep in mind that we don't know who they are. So if they act suspicious, they are going to be voted on.

So did everyone else. Now you're doing the exact same thing to GH. Keep that in mind. You've already hurt the town far more than GH could, unless he's Jotun, but I doubt that.

Your point being...?

CA was a typical random round 1 lynch. You are comparing apples with oranges. It's not like CA revealed or so, he was just unlucky enough to be the victim of a first round bandwagon...

You're doing the exact same thing here...again

I'll agree that GH's Holmganging is probably not the best idea, but really it isn't going to hurt the town that much in the long run.

**Privateerkev** · 08-13-2008, 16:56

Originally Posted by Ichigo

So did everyone else. Now you're doing the exact same thing to GH. Keep that in mind. You've already hurt the town far more than GH could, unless he's Jotun, but I doubt that.

No, no one else bounced their votes around like CA did. I'm sorry he ended up being a God. But I did what I thought was the best thing with what little information I had.

As for hurting the town, don't put all of it on me. People need to take responsibility for their own suspicious behavior. If CA was not a God, or Tratorix not a King, no one would have blamed me for trying to lynch them. CA was an erratic vote changer and Tratorix was absent from the board when the Jotun were missing night actions.

Both of their behavior was suspicious and would have raised eyebrows in any other mafia game. Their roles make their deaths regrettable but do not eliminate the fact that both of these players behaved suspiciously.

If a player has a powertown role, he needs to think carefully about how his actions are perceived by the other players. That is his responsibility.

I can only act on what I know. If a powertown wants to avoid my gaze, and maintain his hidden status, he better not act "scummy." Because in the meantime I have Jotun to lynch and I will ferret them out using the ways I know.

**Andres** · 08-13-2008, 16:57

Originally Posted by Ichigo

I'll agree that GH's Holmganging is probably not the best idea, but really it isn't going to hurt the town that much in the long run.

It's not GH's Holmganging that bothers me, it's his insisting on lynching Tratorix.

**Andres** · 08-13-2008, 16:35

Originally Posted by Ichigo

Just remember what you guys did last time.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

Your point being...?

CA was a typical random round 1 lynch. You are comparing apples with oranges. It's not like CA revealed or so, he was just unlucky enough to be the victim of a first round bandwagon...