The Midgard Saga II [Concluded]

[Privateerkev]

It looks like Craterus was protected. I am assuming by Thor. (Since he seems to be the protecting role this game.)

In Midgard 1, attacks on protected targets still had a write-up.

So, if we assume that mafia of the same "family" can not attack each other, then I believe we can assume that Craterus is totally innocent.

*edit*

I didn't think of the SK angle. SK's though usually give some sort of "catch phrase" so you can get a clue from the write-up. Sometimes, SK's are known to "grin" in some games. Games like Taormina for instance. A great game, but sadly lacking of a write-up...

But back to topic, I think one Jotun, for whatever reason, laid low. And now he isn't laying low. Reasons for "laying low" could be; he simply wasn't getting his pm's in on time, he was sitting out in case he got investigated (Sasaki did this all the time), and he was doing another night action (like investigating.)

[Andres]

It looks like Craterus was protected. I am assuming by Thor. (Since he seems to be the protecting role this game.)

In Midgard 1, attacks on protected targets still had a write-up.

So, if we assume that mafia of the same "family" can not attack each other, then I believe we can assume that Craterus is totally innocent.

Maybe we are reading a different write-up, but it doesn't seem like somebody was protecting Craterus...

The story mentions the "Hulk" and Craterus, nobody else is involved.

[Privateerkev]

Maybe we are reading a different write-up, but it doesn't seem like somebody was protecting Craterus...

The story mentions the "Hulk" and Craterus, nobody else is involved.

In Midgard 1, some of the protections seemed magical. The target would be attacked, would suffer damage, and then would heal or not be hurt.

I seem to remember you being very skeptical of protection write-ups in Midgard 1 as well. Unless we get some other evidence of an SK or multiple mafia families, I'm inclined to think "hulk" is just a Jotun who started killing finally.

[Privateerkev]

Something always bugged me about W&F's writeup but I couldn't put my finger on it until now.

In Midgard 1, Warluster was the only Jotun to get lynched. Here is his writeup (As quoted in the end-game writeup):

As Warluster dies; I’ll quote the text from the lynching: “Warluster was greeted by a sweet woman’s voice and the scent of fresh air: “Welcome strong one, I will take care of you.” Warluster was Trym the strong, a powerful Jotun and he was greeted by Hel into her realm. The townies finally got one of the Jotun and disposed of him. Two to go.

Now, here is W&F's writeup:

W&f dropped to his knees and felt the life force draining between his fingers. The sky darkened and he found himself in complete darkness and barely felt the ground hitting his face.
He was awoken by a sweet voice. “Greetings handsome, I shall take you home to the place of such brave men like you”.

Notice the similarities?

Now; pever, fenring, and w&f all had role pm's with "duel." Perhaps these are the "cover role PM's" Sigurd gave the Jotun?

Also, w&f has been going out of his way to protect Loki and Fenring. In light of this, I think Fenring is deserving of my vote again. I believe w&f went to Hel so trying to use his fate as proof of your own innocence will not work well.

vote: Fenring

tally:

Seamus: 3 (Craterus, Husar, KukriKhan)

Fenring: 2 (LG, PK)

Omanes Alexandrapolites: 1 (TinCow)
Husar: 1 (Curio)
LG: 1 (Sarathos)

abstain: 1 (Motep, GH)

[Kralizec]

So this is your new case against me? Pathetic.

[Privateerkev]

So this is your new case against me? Pathetic.

You sound defensive. Your not in the lead for the lynch. I admit the case is not strong. But I need to vote. I don't think Seamus is deserving of a lynch yet. You on the other hand are trying to base your defense off of a very suspicious write-up.

[woad&fangs]

Brave MEN Kev, Brave MEN

Not only that but it said in the battle that I was a Jomsburgian just like I said.