Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 30 of 198

Thread: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default AW: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    All Roman reforms are under inspection and will see this or that changes. A final decision on the Imperial Reforms has not been made so far but the topic is already on the table. It is obvious that the Marian-Imperial pool might be candidat to cut out units if free slots would be needed, but we are still to early in the process of creating units to say anything in that direction. Each unit had do be done new from scratch and making units for M2TW takes way longer than it does for RTW.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  2. #2
    Member Member Reno Melitensis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melita, the isle south of Sicilia.
    Posts
    315

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    No they should not be removed. They form part of EB's historical background, even if few people generally play long enough to trigger these reforms. In my current campaign, thats my main goal, but it is a long long way, its 184 BCE.

    Cheers.


  3. #3
    :.:: Member Connacht's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where I end and you begin
    Posts
    148

    Default Re: AW: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    Quote Originally Posted by konny View Post
    It is obvious that the Marian-Imperial pool might be candidat to cut out units if free slots would be needed
    My personal opinion is that I wouldn't consider both Marian and Imperial units together. The topic about removing Imperial units is one, but thinking also of Marian units is another one and IMHO they shouldn't be removed (more easily and quickly to get than Imperial units, and they also cover a larger timeframe).
    If slots are needed I would consider only the Imperial units to be cut out, and even after them I would consider rare minor units of any faction rather than Marian ones.
    You're an island of tranquillity in a sea of chaos.



    O! Plus! Perge! Aio! Hui! Hem!

  4. #4

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    No Konny meant, if I got it right, that conceptually, there exists overlap between Marian and Augustan reforms; in other words: that there are currently purely duplicate units present. Those duplicates may be removed.
    Last edited by Tellos Athenaios; 08-26-2008 at 10:18.
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

  5. #5
    :.:: Member Connacht's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where I end and you begin
    Posts
    148

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    Uh, alright then, I though he meant "there is the Marian units pool and the Imperial units pool and they may be considered for etc.". ;)
    You're an island of tranquillity in a sea of chaos.



    O! Plus! Perge! Aio! Hui! Hem!

  6. #6
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default AW: Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tellos Athenaios View Post
    No Konny meant, if I got it right, that conceptually, there exists overlap between Marian and Augustan reforms; in other words: that there are currently purely duplicate units present. Those duplicates may be removed.
    Yes, that's the point. For example the Marian and early Imperial Cohortes are absolutly the same unit by look and stats, and colud be merged into one "Reformed" unit. There are also many, many reformed cavalry units for a faction that made not much use of cavalry. But all this would only become a topic if new unit slots were needed - and we are still far away from that point.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  7. #7
    Jesus Member lobf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    531

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    It would be nice to somehow implement the underlying political and social factors that allowed Octavian to become emperor, rather than the very superficial date and personal qualities of the man.

    That's not to say that any schmuck should become Augustus. I'm only saying that there were probably a huge number of men all throughout history with the intellect and ability of Augustus. There were just deeper reasons for his ascension.

  8. #8
    Biotechnlogy Student Member ||Lz3||'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    1,669

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    yeh...but people are already complaining that getting augustus is way to hard as it is <.<
    Spoken languages:

    Mini-mod pack for EB 1.2 for Alexander and RTW
    (just download it and apply to get tons of changes!) last update: 18/12/08 here
    ALEXANDER EB promoter

  9. #9
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,388

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    Quote Originally Posted by lobf View Post
    That's not to say that any schmuck should become Augustus. I'm only saying that there were probably a huge number of men all throughout history with the intellect and ability of Augustus. There were just deeper reasons for his ascension.
    Killing off anyone who might have been a rival or equal had a lot to do with that accession.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  10. #10
    Jesus Member lobf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    531

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    Killing off anyone who might have been a rival or equal had a lot to do with that accession.
    I guess I don't understand what this has to do with what I'm saying.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO