Battle balance

**BozosLiveHere** · 09-09-2008, 21:32

There's been a furious debate at the TWC about that. I'd rather side with Lusted and empiricism on this.

**Ibrahim** · 09-09-2008, 22:48

Originally Posted by BozosLiveHere

There's been a furious debate at the TWC about that. I'd rather side with Lusted and empiricism on this.

ah, i see now. I didn't know that. I'll notify Kundich.
why didn't you say that the first time? I had no idea, as I said, I was to test this on the weekend-this is by PM mind you.

so only 1 value indeed?

**BozosLiveHere** · 09-10-2008, 01:01

For melee-hit-rate? Yes. Or at least it is very very likely to be so. Missile-target-accuracy allows for infantry, cavalry and elephants entries.

**Lucio Domicio Aureliano** · 10-04-2008, 00:49

Hail

i was wondering since CA removed lethality. Does this means that the EB team, if is their wish to do so, can stop the phalanks of reforming after being flanked because i think this way the phalanks will be better represented.
Polybius tells us that the main reason why the maniple is superior to the phalanks is because of the possibility of keeping man in reserve and when the phalanks start to move flank them and cut them into pieces.

**Foot** · 10-04-2008, 11:46

lethality has nothing to do with a phalanx reforming. I don't know where you got that idea.

Foot

**Lucio Domicio Aureliano** · 10-04-2008, 13:49

I´m sorry Foot. But, do you think there´s anyhow for the EB team, if this is their wish to do so, stop the phalanks of reforming after a flank or rear attack.
Again, i´m sorry even i don´t know where i got this idea.

**Foot** · 10-04-2008, 13:52

No, I do not think there is anyway to solve it. They will always reform to meet the toughest unit, which makes pinning them with low-level spearmen pointless. There may be something in the ai files, but I haven't been able to look at them yet.

Foot