Veep Debate

**Lemur** · 10-03-2008, 05:21

Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff

This was more of a debate than Obama-McCain.

Does that mean I ought to take the time to watch it? I have this sneaky feeling that it isn't worth giving up any work time or play-with-kids time ...

Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi

Ooh, who you voting for? Or that too personal? :)

I'll give you twelve guesses and the first eleven don't count. Hint: My candidate's name rhymes with "yo mama."

**Koga No Goshi** · 10-03-2008, 05:22

Originally Posted by Lemur

Does that mean I ought to take the time to watch it? I have this sneaky feeling that it isn't worth giving up any work time or play-with-kids time ...

I think it was worth it, Lemur. If you could sit through McCain-Obama, this one was worth it.

I'll give you twelve guesses and the first eleven don't count. Hint: My candidate's name rhymes with "yo mama."

I went to American public schools so I might have this screwed up but, YOU'RE VOTING FOR YO YO MA? THE VIOLINIST?!

**Proletariat** · 10-03-2008, 05:23

That doesn't rhyme at all. Lemur is writing in 'Nobama', obviously

**Koga No Goshi** · 10-03-2008, 05:24

Originally Posted by Proletariat

That doesn't rhyme at all. Lemur is writing in 'Nobama', obviously

Huh? Noriega?

**Koga No Goshi** · 10-03-2008, 05:27

*Question moved to Election thread*

**Lemur** · 10-03-2008, 05:34

Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi

Okay, since the question of "what would it take to get you NOT to think so and so won" came up, I have a serious question.

And your question seriously belongs in the main election thread, since this thread is for the VP debates. You gonna get some mod mojo raining down on you head now, boyeeee!

**Strike For The South** · 10-03-2008, 05:40

Biden said Bozniak instead of Bosnian...is that a gaffe?

**Xiahou** · 10-03-2008, 07:33

Originally Posted by Strike For The South

Biden said Bozniak instead of Bosnian...is that a gaffe?

He also claimed the vice president's job was laid out in Article I of the Constitution along with the president's, claiming that Article I was about the Executive Branch.

Of course, it's not- Article I is the Legislative branch. Further, Article I does say that the VP is the President of the Senate, therefore having a role beyond tie-breaking. But, I'm not really surprised that no one jumped on him for that.

**Banquo's Ghost** · 10-03-2008, 07:50

Having read the Election thread now, it is clear that nothing that has been written here is not already in that thread. As it would introduce an element of confusion to that narrative to merge the threads, I'm going to close this one and ask you to continue the analysis of the VP debate in the election thread.