Quote Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff View Post
If a State wants gay marriage, I believe that they can legislate the change.

I my view is that homosexuality is a fetish. I do not believe that there is anything inherent about it. My opposition to supreme court decisions that repeal laws is different. I hate the idea of making things up about constitutions - projecting morality into them that is not there.

Here are two examples of laws that can be viewed as unconstitutional:
A. Miscegenation laws were clearly unconstitutional after the adoption of the 14th amendment, but not before.

B.Women had been citizens since the nations inception - yet they required the 19th amendment in order to get the right to vote - no court should have overturned laws that did not allow women to vote until after that amendment was ratified.

The current trend in the judicial system is radical and unacceptable. It is clearly far outside of the jurisdiction that the founding fathers had envisioned and should cease. If you want something put into the Constitution you should go for it, but we have a process that I trust much more than making things up and disenfranchising the electorate.
So if people are being discriminated against then we need to make laws that eliminate those discrimination when it is against the law to discriminate in the first place?

Plus you never answered any of my other questions. Does that mean it your state passed a law allowing gay marriage you would be alright with it?