Last edited by Fragony; 08-26-2010 at 15:55.
Indeed, and I would castigate myself had I been doing so on matters of which they have experience -i.e. in Indonesia. However, when it comes to Muslims in the UK or Europe, I don't think they have a clue -and I'm still waiting for any kind of substantiation of the outrageous claim that:
And then (admitedly in a different thread):
...where the implication is that 1) (again) you can tell an extremist group by whether the women in it wear Hijabs, 2) it might be ok to shoot a group of Muslims when the women in the group do wear Hijabs.
It is ramadan now. Many more muslim women where I live are wearing Hijabs on the streets than usual. Does this mean there has been a rise in extremists?
Last edited by al Roumi; 08-26-2010 at 16:06.
It certainly isn't true for the Netherlands, most wear it out of piety, the custom has it's roots in Arab islam though. But let's turn it around, why are you so sure that it simply isn't true.
Last edited by Fragony; 08-26-2010 at 16:13.
Because those who I know that wear it, do so out of choice (modesty) and are most certainly not Salafist or fundamentalist. Some are "strict" (e.g. by my definition that means not marrying a non-muslim), but that is still a long way from fundamentalist, never mind extremist. They also insist that everyone they know who wears the Hijab also does so out of choice. They don't deny that there will be some who are forced to wear the Hijab, but they consider them to be a minority. They consider it arrogant that people assume muslim women must be oppressed to wear it.
Al Qaida are terrorists with a clear political agenda which they back up with select bits of scripture. That does not make all muslims terrorists.
I do? Where do I say that?
Some have very different values to me, they might be hard to understand but I have to respect them. Personaly I'd rather women played as full and complete a part in society as men (rather than shutting themselves off through modesty), but if it's a personal choice, I have to respect it. It doesn't make them bad people, let alone terrorists or extremists.
My "line in the sand" is about having a positive desire to coexist and not force things on other people, which is exactly what the UK is meant to be all about.
This isn't about headscarves, it's about potential terrorism. You slammed Cute Wolf's post, so why are you so sure that not every veiled muslima is a potential terrorist, purely theoratical because it's naturally not true.
Last edited by Fragony; 08-26-2010 at 17:50.
Well, it doesn't seem unlike the christians who strongly advise their children to marry other christians, maybe it makes them extremists but it certainly doesn't make them dangerous, in the christian case anyway.![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Goes too far for meas well, that is just tradition, no need for integration they don't have to. A fundamentalist muslim rejects manmade law and wants to live under strict shariah law. That is still an opinion and perfectly fine with me, but when it becomes actively sabotaging the system and preaching hate we have a problem.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Yes, he is. Don't know where you got the idea I was more forgiving of christian nutjobs than of muslim ones. *shrugs*
Refusing to marry someone who's not following your religion makes you an idiot and an extremist. Period. That's without even taking into account the hijab.
Edit : And before one of you comes with up, yes, I'm a die hard atheist, and yes, I've dated religious girls.
Edit2 : And if you're comparing the hijab to "longue sleeves" than it's my turn to "lol" at you.
Bookmarks