There is no "God".

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

By the same token then, 'no God' must necessarily exist, otherwise one could not suggest that 'No God' does not exist, because otherwise it would be impossible to have this dicussion.

Is "No God" merely an idea, or not the Creator of the universe, or not an insignificant microbe? That is the important question, and one which we cannot as yet actually answer.




Henceforward, I shall demand we teach this controversy at school: does God not exist, or is he not an insignificant microbe?

Clever, but silly. Your "no God" is a rejection of "God", not a new concept in itself.

I can think of no greater nothing than there not being any god. Reality is always greater than what we can conceive of. Therefore, there must necessarily not exist any god.

Cleverer, and not denied by theists - except we're still talking about the humanely concieved concept "God" and not the existence of an actual God.