Ασια των βαρβαρων - Asia ton Barbaron

**Populus Romanus** · 02-25-2011, 19:42

There should at least be a Tibetan culture, though. Really, they were a highly unique and very influential culture. It is necessary for historical accuracy for these reasons to include a Tibetan culture.

**jirisys** · 02-26-2011, 17:16

Originally Posted by Populus Romanus

There should at least be a Tibetan culture, though. Really, they were a highly unique and very influential culture. It is necessary for historical accuracy for these reasons to include a Tibetan culture.

Tibetan culture... Ok... But what about the tribes themselves? we cannot give them whole control of all the tribes since they were not united. Eremos could be the solution, but we will have tibetan units and towns for that matter.

~Jirisys ()

**Cute Wolf** · 02-28-2011, 20:37

well? if you meet everyone's demand of culture, eventually the 7 culture slots won't be enough

BTW, after considering the facts, If you include Tibetan culture, you should as well include China, and then the map would be very2 large

**jirisys** · 02-28-2011, 23:20

Originally Posted by Cute Wolf

well? if you meet everyone's demand of culture, eventually the 7 culture slots won't be enough

BTW, after considering the facts, If you include Tibetan culture, you should as well include China, and then the map would be very2 large

They aren't...

~Jirisys ()

**Skullheadhq** · 03-01-2011, 01:48

now, asia without china is not asia! I demand Asia!

with Chinese

HINT : Look at Tanit's post in ol AtB thread

**jirisys** · 03-01-2011, 04:08

Originally Posted by Skullheadhq

now, asia without china is not asia! I demand Asia!

with Chinese

HINT : Look at Tanit's post in ol AtB thread

Culture slot full; AtB Malaysia, Tibet and North China = EB eastern europe, faction slot full, possible landmass crash ratio, Asia meant from Anatolia to India (the known world), they didn't know what china was, uninfluential on the west, religion slot full, China and the subswquent regions that would come with it asks too many units, unnecesary regions would be put in place, etc.

Really, I'd rather have a EB: Han and not the Han in EB: AtB. Their diversity and military cannot be compiled into a few units and a lot of regions.

I hope I did not offend anyone, we want to have the whole world in the map if we could.

~Jirisys (Sadly... The real world is non-compatible with the landmass ratio of RTW

)