I actually like the points you guys bring up because it goes to show that we would do best to make a clear distinction between bringing a Marian army and an Imperial one, and currently there isn't a big incentive to bring one over the other. Big.
Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way
I actually like the points you guys bring up because it goes to show that we would do best to make a clear distinction between bringing a Marian army and an Imperial one, and currently there isn't a big incentive to bring one over the other. Big.
EB Online Founder | Website
Former Projects:
- Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack
- Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
- EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
- Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)
Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way
So I would give the +1/+1 melee bonus to the imperials (with the corresponding cost increase for non-barbarians) and reduce them to 90 men in size? That way the units are represented as a mix of veterans and a few greener troops.Originally Posted by vartan
Europa Barbarorum: Novus Ordo Mundi - Mod Leader Europa Barbarorum - Team Member
"To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a desert and call it peace." -CalgacusRun Hax! For slave master gamegeek has arrived
Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way
How much would they be if you kept them at 200 and figured out a way to decrease the size of auxillaries somewhat?
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way
No. Keep size the same, but make aux sig cheaper.
"Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks