Page 5 of 32 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 150 of 943

Thread: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

  1. #121
    Member Member Ishmael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,562

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    The Vale and Riverlands are unplayable?

  2. #122
    still making Bowser jokes Member Roach Kill Champion, Donkey Rocket Champion Double A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Moonwell Pass
    Posts
    4,606
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    *spoilers*

    I would imagine the Riverlands belong to the Starks due to them proclaiming Robb their king.

    Vale is run by Lysa, so won't do anything till Littlefinger sets things straight.

    Stannis has some crappy islands in his general vicinity, and possibly Florent land, I don't really remember and don't care since House Florent sucks.

  3. #123
    Member Member Ishmael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,562

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by Double A View Post
    *spoilers*

    I would imagine the Riverlands belong to the Starks due to them proclaiming Robb their king.

    Vale is run by Lysa, so won't do anything till Littlefinger sets things straight.
    Have you read A Storm of Swords? The Riverlands (particularly the Freys...) are definitely capable of going there own way - I would think of it more as an alliance. That said, I don't think that in the books they are one homogenous faction, so it probably makes sense that they aren't playable. And I agree that it wouldn't be very in-character for Lysa to do anything, although I think the Arryns do have a sizeable military force which would have to be accounted for (particularly if an 'accident' were to happen to Lysa).

    On a related note, I've just got A Dance with Dragons and am about to go on holiday, so I have a perfect opportunity to read it! It will be nice to be on top of things when this starts.

  4. #124

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Welll its not like the vale has done anything to this point in the stories so thats ok. And the riverlands, well thats disappointing but it can be overcome.

  5. #125
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    To be honest, the main reason those factions aren't in is that I didn't think there would be the player base for nine factions. I would like as many people as possible in each faction, for intrigue and betrayal possibilities, and they were the obvious two not to make it.

    Playable factions should still consider both active, and attempt to communicate with them via the host. They won't act out of character from the books however.

  6. #126
    still making Bowser jokes Member Roach Kill Champion, Donkey Rocket Champion Double A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Moonwell Pass
    Posts
    4,606
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ishmael View Post
    Have you read A Storm of Swords? The Riverlands (particularly the Freys...) are definitely capable of going there own way - I would think of it more as an alliance. That said, I don't think that in the books they are one homogenous faction, so it probably makes sense that they aren't playable. And I agree that it wouldn't be very in-character for Lysa to do anything, although I think the Arryns do have a sizeable military force which would have to be accounted for (particularly if an 'accident' were to happen to Lysa).

    On a related note, I've just got A Dance with Dragons and am about to go on holiday, so I have a perfect opportunity to read it! It will be nice to be on top of things when this starts.
    If I hadn't, how would I have known about Littlefinger in the Vale?

  7. #127
    Member Member Ishmael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,562

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Huh, of course. I need to do a re-read one of these days.

  8. #128
    Looking for a Cul pRit Member Khazaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    480

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I´m in. Thy bidding, Master!

  9. #129
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I am not listed as interested? I thought I did... might be one of those things I meant to do.
    In
    Status Emeritus

  10. #130
    Senior Member Senior Member Yeti Sports 1.5 Champion, Snowboard Slalom Champion, Monkey Jump Champion, Mosquito Kill Champion Csargo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Vote:Sasaki
    Posts
    13,331

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I'm interested.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sooh View Post
    I wonder if I can make Csargo cry harder by doing everyone but his ISO.

  11. #131
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    That's 16 people, at least 2 for each faction which was the minimum to get the game started.
    Last edited by johnhughthom; 12-09-2011 at 12:14.

  12. #132
    Member Member Greyblades's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,408
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I call lanister!
    Being better than the worst does not inherently make you good. But being better than the rest lets you brag.


    Quote Originally Posted by Strike For The South View Post
    Don't be scared that you don't freak out. Be scared when you don't care about freaking out
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

  13. #133
    Semi-Corruptible Member White_eyes:D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Roaming the Great plains...
    Posts
    4,244

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Yeah I am IN, if you still need people.

    I will go for whatever most players think in either one week per turn or one month.

  14. #134
    still making Bowser jokes Member Roach Kill Champion, Donkey Rocket Champion Double A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Moonwell Pass
    Posts
    4,606
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I'm one of those hoity toity TBS fanatics, you should probably stick me in an important faction.

  15. #135
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I've just realised how close we are to the Christmas/New Year holidays. I can have the game ready to go this week no problem, but I'm thinking there may be a lot of inactivity, I'll be unable to do the write ups over the Christmas weekend so at least one round would need to be extended. I think the options are:

    Start this week as planned, have an extended second phase.
    Start a week later, 19th December, with a two week opening phase to give more time for opening plans, diplomacy and alliances.
    Start after Christmas, 2nd January. This would also give time to perhaps get a few more players.

    Thoughts?

  16. #136

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Start now, but with 3-day phases?
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  17. #137
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
    Start now, but with 3-day phases?
    To be honest I wouldn't have the time to devote to 3 day phases, as it is I'll probably spend most of each Saturday or Sunday on results and write ups.

  18. #138
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Maybe we can start, have a long diplomacy turn and just one first phase...
    Hopefully it will get more people interested or at least get everyone acquainted with the factions etc...

  19. #139
    Masked Man Member autolycus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Under Pressure
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I'd go for start now, because first phase I think we'll be too busy learning the ropes to really make use of a double phase.
    My game on Civfanatics could use a few more!: MNOTW XVII: The Cursed Blade!

  20. #140
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by autolycus View Post
    I'd go for start now, because first phase I think we'll be too busy learning the ropes to really make use of a double phase.
    The only problem with that is I'm worried three weeks might be a bit long, people might get bored before it really begins. If that's what the majority want to do then we'll go with it, I guess each faction could try to recruit a full team, allowing them a character each.

  21. #141
    Masked Man Member autolycus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Under Pressure
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I was saying the normal length first phase, double-length second phase.
    My game on Civfanatics could use a few more!: MNOTW XVII: The Cursed Blade!

  22. #142
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by autolycus View Post
    I was saying the normal length first phase, double-length second phase.
    Doh! Reading failure, gotcha now.

  23. #143
    Senior Member Senior Member Jarema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,455

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I agree with Auto

  24. #144
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    i rather have we start now, because i will be unavailable during 2-7 january. but 2-3 weeks is more than enough time to get myself killed :P so now plz!

    We do not sow.

  25. #145

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    starting now sounds good to me!

  26. #146
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    is there any benefit to personally recruiting extra players to your faction or is just for more fun?

    We do not sow.

  27. #147
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    is there any benefit to personally recruiting extra players to your faction or is just for more fun?
    It means they will join your faction, rather than the one with fewest players, and so bring you closer to having personal control of a character.

  28. #148
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    yes but does it really give you an advantage when the character is human controlled instead of npc, or just a lil bit more control (or less if the guy is a treacherous bastard :P)

    We do not sow.

  29. #149
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    yes but does it really give you an advantage when the character is human controlled instead of npc, or just a lil bit more control (or less if the guy is a treacherous bastard :P)
    Nope, no advantage in game, orders will have the same effect whether given as a team or an individual.

  30. #150
    still making Bowser jokes Member Roach Kill Champion, Donkey Rocket Champion Double A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Moonwell Pass
    Posts
    4,606
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Westeros: A Game of Thrones.

    I agree with Auto.

    Besides, I wanna play now.

Page 5 of 32 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO