Results 1 to 30 of 57

Thread: AOR systems, and the historical vs the realistic

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #19
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: AOR systems, and the historical vs the realistic

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
    makes the idea that the Bosporans were somehow incompatible with Roman culture a bit ridiculous.
    I didn't say they were incompatible, the opposite, since they were already hellenized, just had to accept roman overlordship, which they did...
    Can't see them recruiting legionaries among the locals, that's all...

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
    And the Rhine and Danube frontiers had exactly the same situation for centuries before the Limes collapsed, not to mention the eastern frontier with the Parthians/Sassanids.
    The Rhine held until the situation changed; the Danube and the eastern frontiers were at constant war, with few diplomatic breaks, both sides coming and going in the other's territory...


    Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
    Scotland, above the Antonine wall
    That I didn't know, thanks...

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
    A good example was the Legio V Alaudae, which was raised from the native population of Gaul in 52BC and was used to fight Vercingetorix during the Gallic Wars.
    This I strongly disagree, both sides fought in a very similar manner, in the east and steppe it would be quite difficult and in a very limited number, actually more about whether the professional troops decide to side with Roma...
    Last edited by Arjos; 12-27-2011 at 23:47.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO