As long as viagra is covered by insurance I refuse to hear why the pill shouldn't be.

The pill has a litany of uses other than just contraception. Many woman take it to regulate periods or deal with ovarian cysts, to name a few off the top of my head. Now how we handle the particulars of coverage has merit, but to demonize these women as harlots is a terrible strawman and reeks of mysoginy.

This has more to do with women having sex than it ever did with the validity and cost effective measures of the pill. It's a puritanical, knee jerk reaction.