2012 U.S. Presidential Election

[a completely inoffensive name]

stuff

Ehh, you are being disingenuous here. The point wasn't the validity of politifact, the point was that he can make statements about following through on many promises, because whether they are substantiated or not, there are articles that would support said statements. Bold faced lies generally are exposed sooner or later in a general election and often trying to redefine the words/meaning of your original statement makes you look even worse "What is the definition of "is"?"

You are not really contesting my point that he could run on a lot of things, you are just expressing your dissatisfaction with everything that he did. Case in point the fact that just because left leaning and right leaning people don't like Obamacare, doesn't translate into "neither group will be voting for obama". Progressives will still vote Dem because the changes Obamacare made had some steps forwards as well as steps backward whereas they 'know' that under Romney it would all be steps backwards.

Read what I wrote- it's widely disliked. He can't campaign on it. Because people dislike it for a host of different reasons doesn't make it any more marketable.

This is also false. If Obama really wanted to he could achieve tentative support of Obamacare by using PR magic on the good portions of the law. Closing the donut hole which seniors love and extending parents coverage for children until 26 (I think it was 26) years old which young people love. The fact is just that it is easier to be slippery and not make such definitive statements over the bill and let the GOP use it as fodder.