Fritz Vahrenholt...hmm where did I see something about him, oh yeah!

http://www.skepticalscience.com/frit...te-change.html

Frankly if Vahrenholt can't even accurately read the 18-page SPM [ IPCC summary for policymakers ], it's exceptionally difficult to take him seriously. His subsequent comments in the interview reveal that he has been very selective about what scientific research he chooses to accept.
And lots of other goodies there.

James Lovelock has made numerous outrageous predictions before so why should we care about him? It's not like climatology is based on his research is it?

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...imate-science/