
Originally Posted by
Centurion1
You know who is a trained boxer?
Moi.
I boxed (don't anymore it doesn't interest me as much) since I was 11 years old. Even won a young golden gloves competition. So let me drop some knowledge kiddies.
Congratulations Muhammed. Out of curiosity, have you ever been in a real fight?
Part 2 Aka your severe lack of knowledge regaridng human physiology and the technical details of boxing
1. Bare knuckle boxing was made illegal because people get far too hurt. you idiot.
Because far too many people hurt their knuckles? I assume that is what you must mean because of what you say bellow.
2. You likely think boxing is cool because you have never been in a fight with a real boxer or anyone with boxing ability
Thank you for knowing so much about me.
3. Manny Pacquiao or Floyd Mayweather weigh about 60 pounds less than me and probably 200 pounds less than you. They would literally beat the crap out of us.
Of course they would beat the crap out of me. They are much faster, much stronger, and have much more experience. When did I ever say I could stand up against a professional boxer?
4. To say a modern boxer would lose to your bare knuckle boxer of the 1880's is patently false and such an absurd claim I dont even want to address it. He would get his butt kicked in under 1 minute by any professional 21st century boxer. Muhhamad Ali would get his butt kicked too in his prime. If you havent noticed, in every single sport since the dawn of history athletes have gotten bigger, stronger, faster, taller, and more skilled. I, merely your average joe, am in better shape, stronger and faster than most boxers of the 1880's. (I would be destroyed but I am better physical specimen is my point).
If you believe this, you are a fool. You see what you are basing this on? bigger, stronger, etc. You obviously have not been in many real fights Centurion. I have been in a few, and it often is not the biggest and strongest person who wins. It is the most determined and the most skillful. Speed probably is the next most important determining factor, and then reach. Your ignorance is a result of all your fights being gloved fights. In a gloved fight, you almost always need to be larger and stronger than your opponent. You don't in a bareknuckle match.
5. your lack of knowledge regaridng human physiology is chilling. Boxers wear gloves to protect their hands not their opponents faces. A boxing glove spreads the force over a larger surface area and causes more damage, as it also creates a stronger and harder surface to interact with the victims tissue than you hand. Boxing gloves are HEAVY. It is a struggle to even hold them up for a few minutes unless your very strong. They are meant to protect your hands because you dolt you will break your hands punching bone with bare knuckles. I have very small hands which makes it easier for me to punch people as the force becomes concentrated than an individual with larger paws. However, even I know that my hands will break if i start boxing. Even with gloves I have broken my left hand and snapped about 6 fingers. My hands are so ******* up when I went to get my fingerprints for my security clearance the guy doing it asked what was wrong with my fingers. Have you ever seen the hand or bones of an individual from the era of boxing where no gloves were worn? They dont even look human.
Oh, really? How come I know people who can break solidly supported slabs of contrete with their fist? (I can break those same slabs with an open hand, and trust me, it is not easy) How come I have punched people in the face before and done nothing more than lose a little skin because my punch wasn't as straight as it should have been? Why is it that I can punch a concrete wall quite hard and fast without breaking my hand? It is called conditioning, which people who train to punch without gloves do. Without training your hands to strike hard objects, yes, gloves are necassary, but they can be trained.
In summation. You sir insult me. I didnt even want to post in this thread.
I'm just ignoring your lack of knowledge regarding style in boxing, the necessity of rules, and a belief that boxing does not present effective guards and combinations. I am also going to ignore you inability to grasp the difference between a sport and a self defense method.
A good martial art is both. As far as 'effective guards and combinations', save it. I have heard it before from boxers. I cannot grasp how boxers can put so much faith in their guards, because they really suck (esp in a bareknuckle situation). I had a professor who actually made it to an olympic boxing team. I tried discussing boxing defense with her, and she would not even consider that there could be anything better in the world. Here's the thing though Cent, boxing has a very passive defense (overall). A good martial art has an active defense. You think the boxing guards are good because you have not been taught anything better. Let's leave it at that.
Bookmarks