Last edited by Fragony; 09-03-2012 at 12:48.
You did read that it all begun with bill that was proposed by an animal rights party and that passed the lower house?
Wilders, among, apparently, other political parties, supported that bill back then? Or he didn't?
Are all those parties who did support it in 2011 now "far right" and antisemites?
Do you consider animal rights activists potential genocidal maniacs?
What is antisemite in expecting everybody to respect certain legislation? No ritual slaught of animals. If you want to be offended and consider it anti-Islam or antisemite, then so be it. It has nothing to do with religion, but with animal rights.
Last edited by Andres; 09-03-2012 at 12:57.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
A point that carries across to our species too:
" Wrist cutting is not usually life threatening and patients who self-mutilate know it."
Joel Paris, MD, (2004), Journal of Personality Disorders, The Guilford Press.
Even a libertarian like me will concede some freedoms if the reasoning is sound.
#Hillary4prism
BD:TW
Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra
Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts
Also, the idea that being against ritual slaughter and holding the opinion that animals should be stunned first equals being an antisemite, a Muslim hater and probably also a racist, a far right adept and, why no, a neo-nazi and a genocidal maniac, is completely and utterly ridiculous, to say the least. In fact, it's so ridiculous that it becomes hilarious.
Last edited by Andres; 09-03-2012 at 13:03.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Which means the Dutch Party Animals areNazisanti-semites too!
http://youtu.be/JngI1_8beoA
I did not immediately read the article, and spent the first page saying to myself "I thought Gene Wilder was dead and I thought he ws a Canadian"
I don't know if this guy is being an anti semite so much as pretty anti religion in general, which I really dont have a problem with
Last edited by Major Robert Dump; 09-03-2012 at 13:27.
Baby Quit Your Cryin' Put Your Clown Britches On!!!
Such laws have been passed and are in effect in Belgium and rightly so, if I may add. Is Belgium a fascist anti-Semite country now? If that Haredim bastion of Antwerps can deal with, so will the jews in the Netherlands. I don't get the deal really. If anything we should be shunning the religious extremist reaction, especially as they want to counter the democratic procedure of law making and equality in The Netherlands.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Banning infant circumcision is fine too in my book.
I would like a response from you, I think both I and the others in this thread who have argued passionately and in good faith here deserve one. There is no logical reason for Jews or Muslims to be allowed special pleading in cases like this - in fact, in a secular society such is unacceptable.
Why should Europe pander to dietary laws designed for an arid climate and bronze age technology?
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
Wrong. Some time ago a law was passed to outlaw the mink fur industry in the coming years, and the PVV was one of the parties in favour.
Unsedated slaughter has been illegal for some time, but the law allowed exceptions for religious practices. I'm undecided on the issue, but the stance is not anti-semetic just because it happens to conflict with the Torah. If there were any Aztecs around, banning human sacrifices would not be racist either.
Of course people could have anti-semetic motives for doing so, but I seriously doubt that was the case for any of the politicians involved. It was an initiative of the Animal Party. One of the parties in favour at the time was the Labour Party, then lead by Job Cohen (I don't think he's religious, but his name should give you an idea how likely it is he is an anti-semite)
Last edited by Kralizec; 09-03-2012 at 22:51.
Apparantly I was wrong Belgium still allows it, outlawing was a big thing though. But it is forbidden in Sweden, Iceland and guess what? Norway.
Also your argument about importing kosher meat is not valid. The biggest producer and by far the largest exporter of Halal meat, which has the same condition and is a bigger industry than kosher meat, is New Zealand. It is also the main source of Halal meat in Europe. And guess what, again these animals were required by law to be sedated. Buyaka! In other words Norway is preventing their muslim and jewish civilians to break their traditional laws. And when they try by exporting, they are usually still breaking them without knowing it. You guys are evil! You should think about moving to another country.
Last edited by Moros; 09-04-2012 at 00:48.
Kinda scary a realisation that Horetore actually meant it. Lefties usually furiously scream that he's a puppet of the zionist movement. And now all of a sudden when jews don't get special treatment it's anti-semitism, at least make a choice. At first I thought Horetore apreciated the irony but I have always been terrible at leftist logic, I just don't see it
Frag you really need to stop lumping the entire "left" into one group - the Left side of the political scale is made up of many different groups with varying views much like the Right is, and not everyone who aligns to the Left thinks the same thing
in this case I think Horetore is pushing it a little - I don't see where he made his leap to Anti-Semitism...
Wilders seems to be supporting the Ethical slaughter of animals - something I can wholly support
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
I'm pretty sure that HoreTore raised this topic before, and that he thought that the Norse law was probably racist at the start as it was enacted in the late 1920-ies or something like that. Which is not an unreasonable assumption.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
There is a moral obligation to animals not to make them suffer unneeded cruelty, it is easy to understand this is not necessarily an anti-semite issue.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
I think that is true for the Netherlands as well, about the same time it was banned here I believe, law was reversed after the war. At the time, yeah probably anti-semitism. But it's utterly redicoulous to play that card now, and very very annoying. I don't hear the muslims complaining about having to sedate the animals, most already do so anyway. If it's such a big deal to jews they just move to a country where it is allowed. The import of kosher meat isn't banned so they should just shut up.
Frags makes a good point about the sedation of animals. I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense to ban kosher and halal slaughter outright. Interestingly, the Netherlands is one of the largest exporters of halal meat.
This space intentionally left blank.
Humans are animals.
A secular democracies laws should apply as evenly as possible to all adult members. Religion should not be a trump card, if the religion can get enough votes to win in the voting then that is the way to do it. Also being a religion does not make its ruleset wiser, smarter or better automatically then the majority.
Religion is not a get out of jail card. Otherwise what stops the NT-Mayan apocolapse mixed with Aztecs from having a chocolate orgy finished with the ritual slaying of a member of the group. After all it's a religion.
Agreed. I am really annoyed at what they insist this to be. It's not an attack on jews or muslims (muslims are not looking for pittytude I might add they are fine with it). It's rediculous to suggest otherwise. Jews get the same treatment as everybody else, must be hard on the chosen people,off with the accusations
Bookmarks