Euro Area

[Fragony]

Nope, the constitution of the nation-state of the Netherlands is not the same thing as the statutes of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Dutch queen's position is inconstitutional because she has less royal blood than the cheese-royale at the Burger King. She knows that perfectly well and that is why she furiously refuses any DNA tests.

[Conradus]

Nope, the constitution of the nation-state of the Netherlands is not the same thing as the statutes of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Dutch queen's position is inconstitutional because she has less royal blood than the cheese-royale at the Burger King. She knows that perfectly well and that is why she furiously refuses any DNA tests.

Can you please come with any coherent explanation/sources/whatever for this? Because I really can't see what your point is. What are those statutes and why is your queen's position unconstitutional? If she is a descendent of Willem I, she is your constitutional queen. But you're saying she isn't connected to a previous Willem which doesn't matter according to your constitution.

What I get so far is this:

Beatrix is an unconstitutional queen.
She's unconstitutional because she's not related to the original Orange-Nassau family.

But your constitution does not demand she'd be related to that family, she only has to be a lawful descendant of your first king. So you have to argue that she's not. But that has never been your point?