Wrong, as PVC pointed out.
The problems of what currency the Scots would use is a relevant question though. They can't keep using the pound if the English won't allow them to, obviously. They could go for a currency opt-out like the British or the Danes. Wether that would be a good idea is another question.
Yeah, I'm against that, just like I'd be against any plans the EU might develop in the future to murder kittens and to clone Hitler. Those are bad ideas.3. IF you are part of a Single European State you may have broken away from an "enforced nation state" but you are already in part of an 'enforced superstate'; out of the frying pan and into the fire! IT does not matter anymore! Your taxes and laws all come from Brussels and are mostly 'directives' which you have to obey. You vote means NOTHING regionaly because someone beaurocrat in Brussels dictates where your taxes will be spent. Did you elect him? No. Can you get rid of him? Well there may be ways that will occur to some but they are not 'legal'. Can your MEP do anything about it? Only refuse time and again what he is asked to vote on... so no. He cannot repeal any laws or create new ones. That's it pal... end game and LOSE for you.
Can you guys please stop throwing around these purely hypothetical scenarios as if they have any bearing on the presesnt situation? If you want to discuss specific transfers of power to Brussels, fine. Just don't use these inane slippery slope arguments that Brussels is inevitably going to become a centralized seat of power where bureaucrats will micromanage every detail of your personal life; arguments that are purely speculative and which have no basis in reality or common sense.
Bookmarks