Results 1 to 30 of 109

Thread: Concerning Dyslexia

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #17
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Concerning Dyslexia

    I connect with boys on a personal level faster than girls, but I connect with girls on an educational level faster than boys. Anyhoo:

    It was an argument against the right-wing antifeminist rant about schools being designed to favour girls instead of boys.

    As for actual ability comparisons: more girls are in the bottom end of the math scale, but more girls are also in the upper end. Boys dominate the middle. Funnily, the graphs for boy/girl ability match the majority/immigrant graph... But that's a subject for a different thread!

    Yes, "dumb" means "less intelligent". How can we define "less intelligent", if not by looking at a persons abilities? Also, dyslexia isn't a reason why a person can't write. A person isn't unable to write because he has dyslexia, he has dyslexia because he can't write. In other words, "because he's too dumb/unintelligent to write".

    Following your posts arguments, dyslectics are thus defined as dumb. Is that a fair definition?
    Last edited by HoreTore; 12-04-2012 at 15:21.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO