Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
Kiss->forhead, why can't we just get along

It's still bull by the way
The New Age movement has embraced enviromentalism, and it's no surprise that anything coming from the new age movement is complete and utter bull, just like any other spiritual and/or religious movement. In addition to that, the nature of science is such that a lot of what we consider proven today is in fact false, which is shown by how many times we have realigned our knowledge in the past. Claiming that our current knowledge of the enviroment cannot be one of those is ridiculous and just plain un-scientific. It needs to be disproved before it can be rejected though(as its current status is "proven"), and that hasn't happened yet. There's a continuous realignment going on, of course, like with any subject.

An additional comment is that the political side of those who reject man-made climate change has attracted countless hordes of hacks, frauds, retards and idiots. They've done more to discredit alternate scientific theories than the Vatican could ever dream of back in the days of Galileo.

@TR:

Your OP contains this quote:

Quote Originally Posted by You
"how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution...."
SaveThePlanetProtest.com
This quote is downright false. It simply does not exist. It's a false quote. If you had put any effort into your post, and checked its existence, you would've known this. As for changing "poison" to "pollutant", it's still a huge miss. Check up the definition of "pollutant". This is a fundamental error, one which tells me that you haven't the faintest bit of knowledge of natural science. It's like writing a paper on grammatical errors and having consistent a/an errors.

I see no effort on your part to make a coherent argument, and so I don't really see the need for me to counter your wall of errors. The best argument against the OP, is the OP itself.