Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
could you support your claims, please show what evidence your referring to.
" demonstrated a refusal to examine any evidence which he disagrees with"
Your refusal to engage with my arguments in a previous thread, or Sugurd's

translation
I think you misunderstand, i never said every translation is perfect, in fact no english can really be 100% perfect from herbre/greek. Please reread op.
Variety of translation demonstrates variety of transmission, which invalidates the Bible as a final authority.

variable canons
please provide what you are referring to, apocrypha?. Also who cares if some see some books as more important? variety of doctrine in many books all have their fav etc.
I direct you to the Council of Trent, the Council of Carthage (Provincial) and the 39 Articles of the Church of England, wherein you will find differences of opinion on what the "Bible" is.

mark
i think its generally accepted that marks ending was added on. The ordinal bible is there in full.
Except that until about a hundred years ago the longer Mark was the more widely read. Only recently has that determination been made - for most of the last 1500 years most Christians having been working from a corrupt text.

orange bible? what is that, not to mention my op is on original bible, not any and all transitional of the bible. Do we have the original bible from witch to translate,yes.
Certain passages are so corrupt that they cannot be recovered from examination of dozens of anciant authorities. The Bible is broken, Thanks be to God.