Well, for one thing that wouldn't include the US - and it's important to generate US outrage early when Russia starts it's invasion. That's why you need US troops on the borders, not lots, but enough that Russia has to attack them in the first instance.
Also, you can't just "export/import" units, you have to embed them. Any meaningful deployment would need to be measured in years, preferably a couple of decades before the unit is rotated out. There are places in Germany (or were) British soldiers don't want to see bombed, specific curry houses, or strip clubs, or brothels. That sort of thing.
It's about building a long-term attachment to another place, not integrating us into one European nation - in fact that would currently run counter to any effort to defend against Russian aggression.
Europe can't match the Russian military muscle, or access to raw materials, and we need to OVEWRMATCH them in any case.
I must be thinking of someone else.
You mean the Russian friends under Putin Facist boot?
I thought the Germans had got that message about Facism, but you seem to have missed the memo. It's a bad thing, Husar.
Afghanistan was revenge and Iraq was for daddy.During the cold war perhaps, now you stress our budgets by begging us to support your adventures to secure your oil empire.
Aside from GWB - who was the last US president to use NATO to draw Germany into a ground war?
Oh - and your military need reforming, your soldiers are starting to get fat and sedentary, although to be fair that took six decades longer than it would have taken any other nation with the exception of the Swiss.
Quite so - the US is far from awesome, but Putin is a Tyrant and he needs to be checked for everybody's sake, especially Russia's
Bookmarks