responding to common objections to bible part 7

[HoreTore]

And I think there is some evidence that could at least be interpreted as evidence of Hebrew presence in ancient Egypt. For example the early Semitic/Proto-Hebrew inscriptions inside pyramids.

Given that we know of Semitic Pharaohs, that's hardly a surprise.

Also, it must be stated(though it should be obvious, really) that the new chronology is far from accepted; it is considered fringe science. The loonies have, unsurprisingly, jumped on the bandwagon, but that doesn't change the fact that Rohl's chronology is not in any way an accepted chronology.

The vast majority stick with the standard one, with the predictable furious arguments over minor details.