Results 1 to 30 of 116

Thread: British soldier left to starve after losing JSA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: British soldier left to starve after losing JSA

    As Liam Burns said "There's no more money left!"

    So who is at fault?

    Also Tebbit never said "get on yer bike" any more than Thatcher said "No such thing as society".

    You been brainwashed without knowing it.

    I could spend hours talking about how I believe there should be better funding for the welfare state, NHS and other public services
    They've had £billions chucked at it since '97. Guess what? An 85% increase in managers.
    Last edited by InsaneApache; 07-28-2014 at 16:47.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  2. #2
    Ranting madman of the .org Senior Member Fly Shoot Champion, Helicopter Champion, Pedestrian Killer Champion, Sharpshooter Champion, NFS Underground Champion Rhyfelwyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In a hopeless place with no future
    Posts
    8,646

    Default Re: British soldier left to starve after losing JSA

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiaexz View Post
    Well, it is not that the system is failing, there is no political will to actually engage with the system as many people see it as toxic, due as you mentioned with your very own words "gypsey palaces" and even with the 'I don't vote' topic, you bring up here "But sadly people in this country will be too apathetic to do anything about it."
    If people are dying because of the current system then it is failing. End of.

    Fact 1: Gypsies are building palaces with DWP money.
    Fact 2: Ordinary Britons are dying because the DWP won't give them any money.

    The system is clearly broke. I disagree that there is no political will to engage it, because there seems to be plenty of political will to cut it down piece by piece.

    I also don't get why my complaints about apathy conflict about what I said in the "I don't vote" thread. Like I said do other things for my 'civic engagement'.

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache View Post
    As Liam Burns said "There's no more money left!"

    So who is at fault?
    I'm not here to defend the entire welfare state, I am just saying that I find it disgraceful that this individual was left to die like that. Surely you would at least agree with that?

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache View Post
    Also Tebbit never said "get on yer bike" any more than Thatcher said "No such thing as society".

    You been brainwashed without knowing it.


    "I grew up in the thirties with an unemployed father. He didn't riot, he got on his bike and looked for work and he kept looking till he found it."


    Now unless he just felt like telling a story for nostalgia's sake, I'm pretty sure he's implying that the unemployed should indeed get on their bike just like his father did, and by extension, if they fail to find work then it is their fault for not trying hard enough.

    Not only is that argument wrong, it is irrelevant. Because if everybody on the dole was to suddenly get on their bike and do everything in their power to find work, then the level of unemployment would not change at all. This is because of the fundamental fact that everybody keeps forgetting - there are always far more jobless than there are job vacancies. It is just the nature of our economy - full employment is no longer needed to fuel it.

    So if we, as you suggest, truly can't afford to pay for the unemployed masses, then our only two option are to either let them all die of in some sort of Malthusian check, or reform the economy so that they gain employment. I know which option I would go for...
    At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO