Re: Restless crowns: forging empires [Late era -Skip a few]
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
every time my turn come i get tones of PM and insults from tonno and invicta to play faster
I DARE YOU, TAKE THE SCREENS OF YOUR INBOX. We will see messages from invicta, but not from me. First lie.
Then take the screens of messages that invicta send. I know we will not find insults in them. Another lie.
Re: Restless crowns: forging empires [Late era -Skip a few]
Originally Posted by Tonno
I DARE YOU, TAKE THE SCREENS OF YOUR INBOX. We will see messages from invicta, but not from me. First lie.
Then take the screens of messages that invicta send. I know we will not find insults in them. Another lie.
GO HOME DESLEY number 2.
well this community is . the rules are just for show. if it happens to be at war with invicta then you will get your inbox full. and wall of text and crap every time your turn comes. so i don t like that .
i m not a liar and i m not a cheater so i don t have to bother with player that run from TWC because they can t win fair .
first lose , than dr mac but i never lisen now my turn come so BYE!!
Last edited by Myth; 09-08-2014 at 17:08.
Reason: language
Otherwise look for another player for the Turks. I guess that was what the bad loser wanted from the begin.
Jiub and all the players after him. If you post your save rather than getting back from my save I have to assume you want to continue without me. In that case you can find another player for the Turks and manage the HS in my stead
Just look at this pathetic post and no one broke the rules then, you where the only one, after seeing the situation you are already on a run.
who is the bad loser now???
you just lost one stack and you start treating that you close the HS and go home.
after that .you put tonno your"dog" near you:
You are the subber of DUREX. If I took Egypt I can DEMAND to remove you as my subber. No. I would switch HRE for Egypt as requested by the maker of the HS, and asked that everyone state their minds on the matter.
No. You don't have RIGHTS on the matter of EGYPT.
Later destroyed Persia by cheating:
About Baghdad:
I checked the rules now, and it seems I have broken them.
and now :
If you're running away with the tail between your legs, just say so, we will understand.
It's not like the first time we met some sore loser who runs away when the game gets tough.
also:
I have not been greedy and prepared myself so that I wouldn't be ganged on all side. This is my merit
You really earn this man .you are master tactician i admit now .
i lost the war so i go home .
Just look at this pathetic post and no one broke the rules then, you where the only one, after seeing the situation you are already on a run.
who is the bad loser now???
Me on the run? Lol. You were the ones on the run.Dur3x was so scared that he didn't want to continue. You were so scared that you threatened to attack Moors as in retaliation. By running away back then ,you just admitted that if I play my turns, you lose. And since the all 3 of you were aware you won't beat me on the map, you kept attacking me and insulting me to push me to leave (everybody can read the thread from the begin..). I was indeed leaving, but when I realized how shameful you were acting I decided to give you a lesson, on the map. It's all in the thread anyway, it's not like you can deny facts.
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
Later destroyed Persia by cheating:
I broke a rule and didn't have problem to admit that. A rule nobody was aware of, including you (for your admission).
I copied and pasted rules form the latest HS I started last year and that rule was a new experimental one (you won't find those in any of my other HS and actually in any HS on TWC).
Cheating would imply that I knew about it, but if that was true, I would have played very differently since the begin (like for instance putting armies next to cities for defence rather than building a fort to protect it). And it's not something I can hide..(like you could hide your extra assassins), so I don't see how or why could I have done that on purpose.
But you obviously keep ignoring how I was penalized in Baghdad. And obviously you ignore what the admin said (like you always do when it's something not convenient to you..):
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Nightbringer
As to the penalty over the fort rule breaking. I can see why it might look insufficient, but it is based on the fact that a previous breaking of this same rule had resulted in the situation in this first place. Any attempt to estimate what the situation would have been otherwise and to impose a penalty based on the difference between these two possibilities would be pure conjecture.
Dr Mac in the previous turn broke teh fort rule, which completely affected my strategy and forced my armies to go around, rather than attacking on Baghdad form both sides.
He got back then his punishment (if he didn't break teh rule, I still would take Baghdad fair and square. And if he accepted the punsihment again I'd still take Baghdad fair and square):
New save, use this Admin decision: due to not complying with the rule about fort numbers, the K-Shah cannot move any armies stationed in the offending province next turn. This includes the armies in Baghdad. Furthermore, on the following turn all the forts must be abandoned and one more turn must pass (so all of them disappear) before a new one can be built.
.
But he threatened to leave if the admin didn't convert the punishment to a financial one (5k). And that's why I got 5k too.
On the other hand you and Dr Mac were breaking the assassin's rule (with up to 5 assassins). And obviously you were not in good faith, otherwise you would have warned me about that from the beginning that you had 4 extra assassins and that you'd suicide them asap. Instead you kept playing and kept silent about it, and only after I asked you to suicide the extra assassins (after you played already 3 turns) the things was going to be solved. So the only one being cheating.it's not me..look in the mirror instead.
Re: Restless crowns: forging empires [Late era -Skip a few]
after this i think you and tonno don t have more than 16 years old . really.?? what another pathetic excuse.
me having 5 assassins? i never use one. and admin can look at my save an see there are only 2 in the Mongolian steppe that i never moved since or used , if i m accused for that then you are waist of time for me.
Re: Restless crowns: forging empires [Late era -Skip a few]
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
. the rules are just for show. if it happens to be at war with invicta then you will get your inbox full. and wall of text and crap every time your turn comes. so i don t like that .
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks