Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Neo-Nics

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Neo-Nics

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    The number one cause of bee deaths, according to the botany lecture I attended last week, is destruction of habitat. Specifically meadows.

    But decreasing that means we won't get our new roads and villas, and will have to(gasp!) take the bus more often. So I guess that's not cool. Much better to ban dangerous chemicals with scary names like dihydrogen monoxide or hydric acid.
    There are many papers confirming the toxicity of neonicotinoids for honey bees. It's not banning because of a scary looking name, its banning because the science proves it's harmful. For someone that usually likes to ask if there is scientific backing for other people's opinion, you seemed to breeze right past this.


  2. #2
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Neo-Nics

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    There are many papers confirming the toxicity of neonicotinoids for honey bees. It's not banning because of a scary looking name, its banning because the science proves it's harmful. For someone that usually likes to ask if there is scientific backing for other people's opinion, you seemed to breeze right past this.
    Jumping the gun, I'm afraid. We will probably have conclusive proof within a decade though. Not that I am against a cautionary approach, not at all: there's definitely enough evidence to support a ban.

    But that wasn't what I was getting at. While this chemical kills bees, it's not the major killer of bees; that's destruction of habitat. But we skip that problem entirely, because doing something about it impacts our cozy lifestyles too much. It's much easier to ban scary-sounding chemicals(and all chemicals are unnatural, remember) than it is to do what is most important: protect the habitat.

    How many rage-articles have you seen about a major construction project halted because it will destroy the habitat of some ugly flower, mushroom or frog? How much support is given to the environmentalists then?

    Once again, we are doing what is convenient rather than what is important. Ban neonicotinoids, but more importantly stop paving over flowers.
    Last edited by HoreTore; 10-08-2014 at 09:11.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  3. #3
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: Neo-Nics

    Honey: bee vomit
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

    Member thankful for this post:



  4. #4

    Default Re: Neo-Nics

    I agree with HoreTore: destruction of habitat is probably number one; but with reduced habitat it makes even less sense to make (even "just possibly") what is left toxic.
    And yes Pape I love bee vomit; when I learned how to make alcohol from it I loved it even more :) My decade of mead production came to an end a few years back and all the bottles are now empty; inexcusable really because the process is so easy.
    Ja-mata TosaInu

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO