Tiaexz does a girly job and why Kadagar prefers to be grappled by burly fireMEN

[Montmorency]

Yeah... And here back in the real world you quote one, I will say it again, ONE, feminist blog.

At the same time the movement as a whole wage war on political positions and board of directors...

Do you seriously believe you get a cookie for being able to google "feminism + construction"?

That you then put it forward as some kind of argument seen to the whole, is embarrassing.

And OF COURSE the failed attempt yet again was the mens fault.

That you perceive no irony in saying this is profound. Really, really, low self-awareness here.


As for ACIN's more reasonable complaint (though still strange - after all, these are the very sorts of criticisms most-often used against SJWs):

Arriola - "What's the Big Deal - Women in the New York City Construction Industry and Sexual Harassment Law, 1970-1985". (1990)
Gale - "Women in Non‐traditional Occupations: The Construction Industry". (1994)
Law - ""GIRLS CAN'T BE PLUMBERS"--AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION: BEYOND GOALS AND QUOTAS". (1985)
Whittock - "Women's experiences of non-traditional employment: is gender equality in this area a possibility?". (2002)


I'm not going to upload these, as it's obvious Kad will refuse to see that they refute his point, let alone go to the trouble of reading them.