“Try to interpret this one by Putin:” You don’t know to read? Putin is a nationalist, much closer to your positions and political views than mine. In fact, he should be a role model for all nationalists.

“especially those including abstract notions” What are the abstract notions in Nazism? Killing, invading, slavering, raping? In can give you nationalism and patriotism if you want, but Nazism is not a abstract notion, it is a political agenda that had, I repeat, had, an implementation.

“although interpretations of the term vary with context”. You forgot to bold this part. See, that is your problem you read only what you want, same with Putin documentary, so you lost the full significance…

“Yet they are "done" by law enforcement bodies which are legally empowered to "do" them. In Nicholas II's issue not such bodies put him under duress, thus it was illegal duress, consequently, a crime.” Interesting.
So was Nicolas owner of Russia when he abdicated (owner is what an Autocrat is)? If yes, he is the law, so his decision can’t be illegal. If he is not, the decision is not illegal as no law is enforced at this particular moment… As he gave the Throne to his brother, it looks like he was still the Czar Autocrat, so his word is law, So his decision is legal.