As I said, I knew about this, none of this is news to me - and in fact Greyblades is correct, the article is very low on substance and entirely on the side of the First Nations (they are aboriginal and it's incorrect to refer to them as such,).
The presentation makes it sound like this is all some big shock, but I knew all about it - it was common knowledge enough that it affected British political policy thirty years ago, and that has always been a matter of public record because the reservations were expressed by MP's in the House.
The abuse was systematic (also a matter of record) it was designed to break the children so they could be re-educated.
As to the Church part - epic meh when the BBC protected its own paedophile ring for decades.
Bookmarks