Yes, it's weird, or possibly Wyrd. The likelihood of anything is a function of the complexity of the outcome. Boil it down to it's most simple - if you roll a six-sided die the probability of getting a 6 is 1/6, roll two dice for two sixes and the probability is 1/36.

With me so far?
What does any of that have to do with complexity? Is one roll of the dice as complex as one roll of two dice? Is one roll as complex as the next?

according to current best estimates in Science the universe is infinitely complex
Where do you get that?

The problem, you see, is that it's not possible to actually prove anything other than that you ARE thinking.
That would be one of the most difficult things to prove, actually - right up there with the existence of God.

I had to sit and think about this. The tense of "dove" is the past or "perfect" sense whilst "dived" is the "plu-perfect". So In this case I said "dove" because that was what he did, he "dove" in. On the other hand I could have said, "after he dived into...". So Dived indicates something that happened and has finished, while Dove indicates something that may be ongoing.
Actually, either "dived" or "dove" can be used in either of those contexts. I don't know about relative frequency or geographical distribution, but they are pretty much interchangeable for most speakers.

Compare "Hung" and "Hanged". Pictures are "Hung" on the wall but men are "Hanged" and then cut down - but while they're on the gibbet they're being "Hung".
This is a different matter entirely. We are speaking of two distinct verbs that happen to be homophonous except for these participle forms.

For example:

I ringed the fire with rocks; I rang John on the phone.