Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

You too? Already Novice. Oh well.

<3, OMG, let's meet up on IRC.

Unvote: novice; Vote: Severing Viper

[Montmorency]

Isn't "Champ" a Pokemon?

That would have been a proper disposable vote. Too late now though.

[Champ]

Isn't "Champ" a Pokemon?

That would have been a proper disposable vote. Too late now though.

yes and yes

[GeneralHankerchief]

SeveringViper: By my count, khaan's played with everybody here (however briefly in some instances) except Champ. We'll throw Manasi and Logic in there too I guess because French Rev was a factional game and doesn't really fit in. Not really enough to get self-conscious about IMO.

novice: Re: your section of me in your longer post above, I was going to argue that your conclusion w/r/t your read of me is correct, but I feel like your reasons for reading me as such are bad, so I'm not sure what to do with you at the moment? but then I realized that most of the bones I had to pick with it were playstyle differences and thus not actual bad arguments.

Champ: As mentioned in a different post, khaan doesn't play games on other sites.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Another thing I want to make note of is in Champ's catchup just a few posts above this one, he jumps from my case on khaan (made earlier this morning US time) to commenting about my "pedantics" line (made last night US time), which strikes me as a bit unnatural way of catching up with the thread.

[Champ]

Another thing I want to make note of is in Champ's catchup just a few posts above this one, he jumps from my case on khaan (made earlier this morning US time) to commenting about my "pedantics" line (made last night US time), which strikes me as a bit unnatural way of catching up with the thread.

i always do that

[GeneralHankerchief]

i always do that

Link to examples? IIRC the only game we played together on MU was Copless where you subbed in halfway through, so that's a bit different of a situation.

[El Barto]

I will note posts #326 and #327 for tomorrow. :)

[novice]

novice: Re: your section of me in your longer post above, I was going to argue that your conclusion w/r/t your read of me is correct, but I feel like your reasons for reading me as such are bad, so I'm not sure what to do with you at the moment? but then I realized that most of the bones I had to pick with it were playstyle differences and thus not actual bad arguments.

Just to make sure I'm parsing this correctly - You were going to argue that I was townreading you correctly, but for bad reasons?
But then you realized those reasons weren't bad, but just a bad/different playstyle?
(Stop me if I'm misunderstanding)
Wouldn't that still make the arguments bad, in your opinion?

[novice]

Just to make sure I'm parsing this correctly - You were going to argue that I was townreading you correctly, but for bad reasons?
But then you realized those reasons weren't bad, but just a bad/different playstyle?
(Stop me if I'm misunderstanding)
Wouldn't that still make the arguments bad, in your opinion?

OK, I think I get it now. You're saying that I backed off of you with bad arguments, but that it's not suspicious because it's in my nature to make bad town reads. :)

[El Barto]

OK, I think I get it now. You're saying that I backed off of you with bad arguments, but that it's not suspicious because it's in my nature to make bad town reads. :)

[GeneralHankerchief]

Just to make sure I'm parsing this correctly - You were going to argue that I was townreading you correctly, but for bad reasons?
But then you realized those reasons weren't bad, but just a bad/different playstyle?
(Stop me if I'm misunderstanding)
Wouldn't that still make the arguments bad, in your opinion?

You weren't misunderstanding. Some of the arguments in and of themselves are bad, but they're not necessarily scummy. They're just null in terms of alignment, which is what I care about more than getting into a playstyle discussion. Postgame for the latter, perhaps.

Also I'm not sure if I agree with Logic's case on Monty, but that's probably just from my inability to correctly read Monty in the first place. The case itself feels honest though.

[SeveringViper]

Unvote: novice; Vote: Severing Viper

Is this a "disposable vote" of the sort you mention in your next post, are you declaring suspicion, or both?