Correcting Unvote.
Correcting Unvote.
Not entirely you, but IIRC you are/were (please be "were") the only one who was part of both.
And nah, my novice vote's not locked in, round ends in 19 hours and I should be able to carve out enough time between now and then to get a more solid feel for things.
Sleep for now though.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Two word Mafia.
Tell me what you see.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
How could Sooh's post effect novice's answer? I'm also unsure as to why you thought the question had value in the first place. I honestly don't understand the logic behind it. Feel like the answer would have to be some iteration of what he said, or else he'd look inconsistent. Are you always this antagonistic in games? Your posts give me that vibe, or am I delusional?
Isn't "Champ" a Pokemon?
That would have been a proper disposable vote. Too late now though.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Because when you provide an answer for someone else, you provide them something to point to and draw from? Often when I ask someone something, I care as much about how they answer as what, if not more. And someone stepping in and providing an answer for them that can affect their response and ability to respond is bad.
Or put it this way: If my questioning/pressure could produce genuine results and that is hampered by someone intentionally or unintentionally coaching the one I'm asking how/what to answer, of course it's a problem, no?
As for what the point of the question was, I asked him that to hear about his voting habits, and to determine exactly what type of vote it was. Was he the type to decide a suspect early and/or was it a pressure vote? I felt his answer told me enough about that and moved on.
As long as there's someone in this game who's bothered by swears, I will censor them. That's a time-wasting issue I'd rather avoid entirely.
What if this is the result we seek?Because when you provide an answer for someone else, you provide them something to point to and draw from? Often when I ask someone something, I care as much about how they answer as what, if not more. And someone stepping in and providing an answer for them that can affect their response and ability to respond is bad.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
So you saw Sooh's post as influential to your question/novice? I disagree, but to each their own. Mostly concerned with the tone of it all after the fact, rather than the question itself anyways.
Also, for my own understanding mostly, what was the purposed of going after Logic? What value did you gain from that interaction/argument?
I don't have a ton to add, except Csargo ???
I hope you'll have time to make some general reads on a few people to help me read you, Csargo.
Same goes for most tbh. Even if you're uncertain as heck about your reads and you probably will switch them around tomorrow, I'd really appreciate getting them before DL so I can use them to get a read on you. I'll get into and produce some sort of reads list when I'm home from work today.
No, I took issue with the idea of answering for others, not her answer specifically (because it had nothing to do with the question, but that's a past matter).
I started pressuring him because I saw an apparent contradiction that wasn't answered, and I push apparent contradictions that aren't answered. What I got out of it was that he's someone that has trouble conveying exactly what he means and that approach wouldn't do any good with him. The discussion was otherwise alignment-neutral.
(On an unrelated note, day phases are 48 hours, and d1 started two days ago at about 12:30 PM EST, so it would end early this coming afternoon for me, but the phase end time is set for roughly 6 PM, meaning it would end then, so how much time is there-
SeveringViper hurt itself in its confusion!)
6PM EST, so idk if that's a conversion you'll have to do or something.
3PM PST
11PM UK
midnight CET
Viper is combination of novice, Zack, and Jabbz?
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I yearn to rely on a stronger will.
I fear what I'm capable of in its absence.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks