Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [Concluded]

[Sooh]

I don't have a ton to add, except Csargo ???

I hope you'll have time to make some general reads on a few people to help me read you, Csargo.

Same goes for most tbh. Even if you're uncertain as heck about your reads and you probably will switch them around tomorrow, I'd really appreciate getting them before DL so I can use them to get a read on you. I'll get into and produce some sort of reads list when I'm home from work today.

[Csargo]

I don't have a ton to add, except Csargo ???

I hope you'll have time to make some general reads on a few people to help me read you, Csargo.

Same goes for most tbh. Even if you're uncertain as heck about your reads and you probably will switch them around tomorrow, I'd really appreciate getting them before DL so I can use them to get a read on you. I'll get into and produce some sort of reads list when I'm home from work today.

I was trying to determine what SV was doing, mostly because some of his reactions and arguments seemed scummy to me, because I didn't see what they accomplished. I think I understand what he's doing, I don't know if it has long-term value, but we'll see.

As far as reads go I don't have much. Think Barto seems himself so far, khaan's sort of half in character and half ooc not sure what to make of that. I'm unsure of SV, but want to see what happens going forward. Not sure I've ever played with SV before. I'm not sure what to make of novice yet, I'll probably go through the thread again tonight and see if anything jumps out to me. Actually I'll try to look through it before I have to work, because the day will be over, before I get off work iirc.

[Sooh]

To me some of your (Csargo) posts read almost like a defense of me, and that's strange.

[Csargo]

To me some of your (Csargo) posts read almost like a defense of me, and that's strange.

???

[Csargo]

To me some of your (Csargo) posts read almost like a defense of me, and that's strange.

I found it!

I'd say you're perceiving my actions incorrectly then. I didn't think SV's reaction to your post was warranted, so I questioned him about it. My goal was to understand his thinking, your post was just the example I used for my argument.

That being said, I have you as leaning town atm, for various reasons.

[Csargo]

I found it!

I'd say you're perceiving my actions incorrectly then. I didn't think SV's reaction to your post was warranted, so I questioned him about it. My goal was to understand his thinking, your post was just the example I used for my argument.

That being said, I have you as leaning town atm, for various reasons.

argument/questioning would be more accurate.

[Csargo]

Vote:Choxorn

Choxorn looks pretty bad to me at this point. His posts/vote don't lineup at all.

Why are people voting Monty for being Monty?

[SeveringViper]

Vote:Choxorn

Choxorn looks pretty bad to me at this point. His posts/vote don't lineup at all.

Why are people voting Monty for being Monty?

The vote on GH and claim?

Consider that Choxorn looks to be half-suspecting Monty while justifying his voting elsewhere, and easily following his vote today?

[novice]

Vote:Choxorn

Choxorn looks pretty bad to me at this point. His posts/vote don't lineup at all.

Decent case. Vote:Choxorn

[SeveringViper]

I didn't think SV's reaction to your post was warranted, so I questioned him about it. My goal was to understand his thinking, your post was just the example I used for my argument.

Please clarify, were you questioning my reaction to that post specifically, or my policy of being that against people answering for others with that post just being your chosen example?
Or in other words, did you think specifically my reaction to Sooh's post was unwarranted, or would you have been just as willing to bring up my response to Cuth?

[Csargo]

Please clarify, were you questioning my reaction to that post specifically, or my policy of being that against people answering for others with that post just being your chosen example?
Or in other words, did you think specifically my reaction to Sooh's post was unwarranted, or would you have been just as willing to bring up my response to Cuth?

I could have used your reaction to Logic, which I believe Cuth pointed out. Your reactions in general is what I wanted clarity about going forward. Does that answer your question?

[SeveringViper]

I could have used your reaction to Logic, which I believe Cuth pointed out. Your reactions in general is what I wanted clarity about going forward. Does that answer your question?

...No, because I never said anything to Logic about answering for others?

[novice]

A selection of Csargo's posts:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

It honestly took me a while to understand this...

You can click on the number of posts outside the thread and then selected whoevers # of posts you want to ISO, or at the top of the page there's a search thread -> advanced search -> input the username of whoever in the box and search. Both ways are a pain, and MU's ISO is far easier.

Sooh's fireworks post is the best thing itt so far. I have yet to fully digest everything that has been said by the top three posters so far. I've been binge watching netflix and I'm sick, so my brain is a bit scrambled at the moment. I'll probably get around to actually reading everything fully tonight, and post thoughts then. I've just been skimming the thread tbh.

This is an odd reaction to Sooh's post. Given how you've pursued D1 so far. I'm unsure of what you're trying to accomplish, Sooh was adding content to the thread, even if the question wasn't directed towards her. So why?

How could Sooh's post effect novice's answer? I'm also unsure as to why you thought the question had value in the first place. I honestly don't understand the logic behind it. Feel like the answer would have to be some iteration of what he said, or else he'd look inconsistent. Are you always this antagonistic in games? Your posts give me that vibe, or am I delusional?

So you saw Sooh's post as influential to your question/novice? I disagree, but to each their own. Mostly concerned with the tone of it all after the fact, rather than the question itself anyways.

Also, for my own understanding mostly, what was the purposed of going after Logic? What value did you gain from that interaction/argument?

I was trying to determine what SV was doing, mostly because some of his reactions and arguments seemed scummy to me, because I didn't see what they accomplished. I think I understand what he's doing, I don't know if it has long-term value, but we'll see.

As far as reads go I don't have much. Think Barto seems himself so far, khaan's sort of half in character and half ooc not sure what to make of that. I'm unsure of SV, but want to see what happens going forward. Not sure I've ever played with SV before. I'm not sure what to make of novice yet, I'll probably go through the thread again tonight and see if anything jumps out to me. Actually I'll try to look through it before I have to work, because the day will be over, before I get off work iirc.

I like what I see so far actually. Is sick so doesn't post, but still reads the thread, as evidenced by the first few posts. Then has a back and forth with Viper which reads as genuine investigation. More would be better of course, but so far I like it.

[Champ]

I don't like manasi
Vote: Manasi

[Choxorn]

I don't like manasi
Vote: Manasi

Why not?

Seriously, explain your thoughts a little more. One-liners don't say much of anything. Why don't you like Manasi, and why do you like Khaan?

[Champ]

Why not?

Seriously, explain your thoughts a little more. One-liners don't say much of anything. Why don't you like Manasi, and why do you like Khaan?

i feel like she doesnt want to be here and isnt enjoying herself
she loves being town and her lack of engagement is nagl
i dont like khaan i just dont think hes the best lynch

[Manasi]

i feel like she doesnt want to be here and isnt enjoying herself
she loves being town and her lack of engagement is nagl
i dont like khaan i just dont think hes the best lynch

You literally made this up on the spot.

You know I'm in 3 games right now.

You took my scum read on you and flipped it to me and that's insanely unrealistic and inaccurate.

[Logic]

Trying to catch up, but here is my thinking through post #500

May I ask what were the reasons for voting in favour of the lynching of Monsieur Montmorency yesterday?

I'd rather not repeat myself, but may I direct you to my case here?

Would agree with all this. Strangely don't like the Mont wagon though despite shady read. Seems like a fool's train. Not really hairy, but like it went in the lead almost incidentally.

To GH about meta question: Off the brief posters, they just stood on in my mind. Csargo mores from past difficulty reading him.

Monty is scummy, but he's not scummy because he is in the lead? What gives?

...No, because I never said anything to Logic about answering for others?

You are going to have to clarify this statement, because it looks like a direct contradiction of this one:

What do you think of cuth answering for you?

I don't like manasi
Vote: Manasi

i feel like she doesnt want to be here and isnt enjoying herself
she loves being town and her lack of engagement is nagl
i dont like khaan i just dont think hes the best lynch

Manasi is less active than in French Rev, but this feels less like a valid read on her, and more like a desperate cover.
Not liking these posts by Champ.

My wolf leans:
Monty
Champ
Severing Viper
Raith Kemmler

My Town leans:
Sooh
Autolycus (mostly because he agreed with my Monty vote, but not in so many words)
Manasi

Everyone not mentioned I haven't spent a lot of time analyzing their posts. Expect another update around 10:30 AM PST.

[Jabbz]

My time is limited atm, could someone point a few post numbers to me that are making the major arguments against Chox? Thanks.

[novice]

My time is limited atm, could someone point a few post numbers to me that are making the major arguments against Chox? Thanks.

I don't think anybody has built a big case, he got votes just now for a dodgy vote on Champ, and he's come across as an unhelpful lurker. He seems to be delurking now though.

[SeveringViper]

My time is limited atm, could someone point a few post numbers to me that are making the major arguments against Chox? Thanks.

His posts numbered 344, 351, and 357.

[novice]

Champ: Seems like a strong player. May be self-resolving. Not lynching him today at any rate.

[Jabbz]

His posts numbered 344, 351, and 357.

Almost looks like he's shooting to vote for someone, but wants to be able to point to someone else later and be like "they told me to." Not exactly a subtle move tho.