Pokemon Nuzlocke FireRed Mafia [Concluded]

[Champ]

Novice is never wolf

[Logic]

Novice is never wolf

This is an inherently unhelpful statement.

Previous games have no bearing in role assignment for this one. Furthermore, I doubt the veracity of your claim.

[Champ]

This is an inherently unhelpful statement.

Previous games have no bearing in role assignment for this one. Furthermore, I doubt the veracity of your claim.

no.

[El Barto]

Novice is never wolf

This is an inherently unhelpful statement.

Previous games have no bearing in role assignment for this one. Furthermore, I doubt the veracity of your claim.

I interpret Champ's statement as meaning that he doesn't see novice being a member of the mafia team under any circumstances, based on his public behaviour this game. Maybe he could confirm or deny this.

I was suggesting that looking for additional third parties, especially non-killing third parties (unless you construct a fairly convoluted and unverifiable picture of night events), is the wrong idea for our circumstances when you can't otherwise peg someone as Mafia.

Ah. I concur. Thanks for clarifying.

Logic looking bad does not make Champ look good, but Logic looking good does make Champ look worse.

Ah-ha, do go on. To my eye, there is a high probability that one of Champ and Logic is a mafioso.

What are you referring to from Jabbz, this?

The interactions of the current day leave me with the impression that Champ and Logic are of opposite alignments, in other words, one of them is an innocent and the other is a mafioso.

So, half of Jabbz's innocence is the one post and the rest is what is commonly known as a ‘derp-clear’? He also says

>If he is town, I'm wrong, you will lynch me, and town will lose, but I'm fairly certain I'm not wrong.

A statement with which I really am not quite comfortable. Why lay down the groundwork towards tomorrow's defence? It is almost as if he knew something we did not.

He doesn't reference someone else's flip, so I assume that isn't it...

The text in green is the quote from Jabbz I was referencing.

Zack implicitly claimed to have blocked Csargo's kill, and Monty just didn't get that that's what Zack was doing and kept questioning what Zack was doing. My feeling, and I think this was what Zack felt also, was that scum wouldn't act that way in that situation. They would understand what Zack's vote was about and they would be trying to distance themselves from Csargo. They would not be making Zack spoonfeed them his claim. In fact, read GH's reaction to see a likely scum reaction.

The very last sentence does sound interesting. Do go on.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Ah-ha, do go on. To my eye, there is a high probability that one of Champ and Logic is a mafioso.

Elaborate please. The two are somewhat connected to each other in terms of associative tells but I don't think it's anywhere near lock that one's scum.

[Montmorency]

The text in green is the quote from Jabbz I was referencing.

But that text (or subtext) wasn't in the post I quoted, nor the one following it. Are you referring to some other post? If so, please link it.

[El Barto]

Elaborate please. The two are somewhat connected to each other in terms of associative tells but I don't think it's anywhere near lock that one's scum.

See posts #1587, #1588 and #1591. I do not like that little exchange one jot.

But that text (or subtext) wasn't in the post I quoted, nor the one following it. Are you referring to some other post? If so, please link it.

It is in the second paragraph of post #1581.

[Manasi]

Damn GG game's lookin' up.

Champ/GH/novice/Monty p good circle IYAM.

God bless.