Or They simply state Hellerstedt is still law. Which they can do. The appeals court said the Louisiana case was factually different than the Texas one. In reality, its a bald face attempt to force something to change because they perceive to have the numbers now.
Or summary reversal, as laid out here. https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/03/s...rily-reversed/
I mean this pretty much pits the institution against the politics(which has always been a struggle, but this is very blatant). We will have to see which one of us is right.
Bookmarks