i read what you are saying and I can sorta buy it but i also think if framed differently it becomes the same argument you used about jan/rask. his post about the syn wagon for example is just like -- to quote you -- "There's no way X would do [openly pro-wolf thing] as wolf! They're too good to [lock wolf a team mate / blatantly push a town counterwagon to a wolf / etc!"
why is his comment a lack of TMI but rask or jan's not (i dont even disagree about rask really, i do think jan is likely town, but why does ender get cushier treatment)
genuine question and not antagonistic, i just dont follow WHY you are townreading him for these things even though you gave reasons as to why it could be town. "i dont know why he'd choose to replicate this as a wolf" when you are towning him at least partially for it is a good example of one of those cognitive dissonance type posts that drive me crazy (no offense and i know i do it too).
Bookmarks