No because the gay rights activists refuse to acknowledge what MARRIAGE is - a contract between one man and one woman. Anything else, by any stretch of the imagination, does not = marriage.
If you want a contract between two men as 'life partners', then you can never make it a true marriage.
Also what of those who do not want any form of life partner? Why are they discriminated against?
The answer to solving the problem of who's going to make decisions for you when your in a hospital bed cannot be solved simply by giving those powers to whoever you happen to be sexually attracted to, because that will not cover everyone.
So, if gay marriage:
a) is not in fact a marriage in the true meaning of the word
b) does not end discrimination but rather only very marginally extends the franchise as it were
Then it is clearly not an ideal solution.
Bookmarks