Results 1 to 30 of 742

Thread: The Prometheus: Large Mafia Game [Concluded]

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Senior Member Senior Member Reenk Roink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,353

    Default Re: The Prometheus: Large Mafia Game (In Progress)

    Ok, Aries777777, where are you buddy? You didn't vote last round, and I could not find another suitable man to follow so I didn't vote last round (though I participated but our captain says it is not enough; he must follow that silly "Vote or Die" slogan ).

    Early on you were active with your jokes and your votes, but now you're gone and I'm not laughing or guided, and it's becoming terribly hard to play in my new way. I may have to vote for you in the future.

    Because I am not kept satisfied by such good humor, I took some time out to be 'analytical' today in the hopes that maybe I could be helpful to us crewmembers.

    First, I am shocked that Sigurd Fafnesbane was lynched this early for a pretty weak reason, even by common townie standards. An incredibly stupid thing to do if I may criticize the crew.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    The history of Mafia has seen a lot of great people (many of the new ones I don't know so much about either), some almost legendary; but Siggy Fafnessie is by far the most complete player. I consider him to be one of the best hosts and one of the best townies, as well is the best Mafia ever.


    By lynching him, especially this early, Sigurd's alignment is unknown. You can imagine the epistemic problems this brings when he will attempt to posthumously 'help' the town...

    What would have been wiser was to let the Mafia kill him off, at least making it much more plausible that Sigurd was innocent or in a non-Mafia role. Then he could help us and we could trust him.

    And had Sigurd remained alive by the end stages of the game, you could be sure that I would be on him hard for it. Sigurd has screwed the town and myself personally over brilliantly twice before in endgame, and one of my personal goals is to foil him.

    What we did to Sigurd is the worst thing to do concerning him.

    Secondly, I'm saddened though not surprised at how dogmatically people draw conclusions about the Mafia from scant evidence such as write ups or non killing behavior. They really prove nothing, and I would never make conclusions about the number of Mafia or how they operate from them personally.

    Lastly, and I held off on doing this for a bit because I respect Seamus Fermanagh a ton, but I would be somewhat inclined to view him suspiciously since the get go.

    Read this:

    Quote Originally Posted by Kommodus
    Er... the one person whose behavior really sets off my alarms at this point, and who I'd like an explanation from, is Seamus Fermanagh.

    Why is this? Originally it was because mathematically, he's registered a definite behavior change from past games. He posts less and his posts are generally shorter. This doesn't mean much, but it was enough to get my attention and make me look into the content of his posts.

    What I've seen there looks innocuous on the surface - as in past games, he's posted voting records and some commentary on them. We know him well enough by now that it's obligatory that he do this - I'm confident he would do it whether he was a mafioso or not.

    But something's a bit off. The commentary this time is much lighter, not very focused, and lacking the insightful confidence that was there in previous games.
    I think Seamus is doing what he did in that game. He is propping up the same framework so as to not blatantly show a change in behavior, but at the same time, it is also more shallow which, according to popular townie thought, is an indicator of trying to fly under the radar, which, again according to popular townie though, is a telltale mark of Mafia.

    Now, I must add that I am probably one of the strongest opponents of using changes in behavior or semi-lurking as indicators of Mafia, because of the fact that it is such a poorly grounded theoretical framework (yes it has worked before, but I look for an epistemic and not pragmatic justification and you would think Mafia would caught on by now).

    So by no means does this damn Seamus or anything close to it. Unlike Kommodus, I will not endorse voting for people based on the above-mentioned methodology for the above-mentioned reasons.

    I do caution you to deal with Seamus with some trepidation though. Something about him is just not right (actually, that is MY personal reason for my suspicion, and I gave the evidence that usual townies accept so that YOU would also consider it).

    No hard feelings buddy, as I said my personal stance makes me very critical of this method of suspicion in the first place. However, since everyone else is grasping at imaginary threads, I would like to point out a particularly big and fat imaginary thread. You are a great player and were it not for my close knowledge of your ways from earlier times, I wouldn't have caught this.

    I will for now vote: Chaotix27 because Seamus is a good man as any to follow, and again, he is suspicious by the common methodologies gauge (BUT SO IS SEAMUS BY THE SAME METHODOLOGY).

    Hope some of this helped. At the very least, I hope it was interesting in some way that makes the game more fun, which is the main reason to play.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    P.S: This definitely isn't going to be a habit by the way


    A Vote Tally (cause none of you do it anyway ):

    Chaotix27: 4 (seireikhaan, Seamus Fermanagh, YLC, Askthepizzaguy)
    Askthepizzaguy: 2 (shilin28, Alexander the Pretty Good)
    seireikhaan: 1 (White_eyes:D, Ichigo)
    YLC: 1 (Mithrandir)
    Peasant Phill: 1 (Beefy187)
    pevergreen: 1 (Twilightblade)
    shilin28: 1 (Chaotix27)

    Edit: There is no way that Chaotix27 could be Mafia, unless he really doesn't care about getting lynched (such apathy would be legendary and quite ballsy for Mafia ). Voting will be closed in an hour or so

    Unvote: Chaotix27
    Vote: Askthepizzaguy


    To try and force a tie to save a pretty clearly innocent townie (though I don't know if Askthepizzaguy is a good lynch either, he's better than Chaotix27).

    New Vote Tally:

    Chaotix27: 4 (seireikhaan, Seamus Fermanagh, YLC, Askthepizzaguy)
    Askthepizzaguy: 3 (shilin28, Alexander the Pretty Good, Reenk Roink)
    seireikhaan: 2 (White_eyes:D, Ichigo)
    YLC: 1 (Mithrandir)
    Peasant Phill: 1 (Beefy187)
    pevergreen: 1 (Twilightblade)
    shilin28: 1 (Chaotix27)
    Last edited by Reenk Roink; 11-10-2008 at 04:35. Reason: tally still messed up, PEOPLE PLEASE GET TALLIES GOING, REENKSTER IS GETTING ENRAGED

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO