Gay Rights are Not Civil Rights

[Gaius Scribonius Curio]

I think CA has the better argument.

If the Constitution is in place to guarantee the rights of citizens, and yet doesn't protect the basic human rights of everybody then it is an inadequate constitution. While I recognise that any document that does guarantee everyone all their rights is going to be unworkably vague, defending the constitution because, in this case, the issue is 'trivial' isn't right. Constitutions can be changed, or reworded, and if the current one isn't fufilling its purpose then it must be changed, or overidden.