Quote Originally Posted by Fenring View Post
Let me start by saying that I have the highest respect for soldiers serving democracies, and the USA in particular.

Do you ever wonder if your particular opinions were a result of generational differences? I mean, do guys 10 years older or 10 years younger generally feal different about war (in general) than you do?
Good, and interesting question. At age almost-58, I find that age, as a pro-war or anti-war determinant doesn't work reliably. But, I can make a generalized statement that, in my experience, very young (13-19 year olds) men, and over-45 women and men who have never been in the military are the most likely to clamour for military action to be taken when some 'wrong' has been done, or threat perceived. In the gap - men and women aged 20-45, it runs about 50%-50% pro- or con-war in general.

Among those who serve or have served, regardless of age or gender, the conversation seldom judges whether war in general, or a particular war is right or wrong. Rather, they talk logistics: what it would take to achieve some military goal. What factor was overlooked in some previous conflict. That kind of thing. There seems an acceptance that armed conflict has been, is, and shall likely be, inevitable.

The overwhelming majority of vets I personally know agree with "The Powell Doctrine" ("Don't Go; but if you must: Go Big, with a specific, measureable goal").

I hope that answered your fine question, Fenring.