On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Requesting suggestions for new sig.
![]()
-><-
![]()
![]()
![]()
GOGOGO
GOGOGO WINLAND
WINLAND ALL HAIL TECHNOVIKING!SCHUMACHER!
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Last edited by CrossLOPER; 02-19-2009 at 00:58.
Requesting suggestions for new sig.
![]()
-><-
![]()
![]()
![]()
GOGOGO
GOGOGO WINLAND
WINLAND ALL HAIL TECHNOVIKING!SCHUMACHER!
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
techincally. its well known that iran funds hezbollah and such, so i guess they are... in a way....
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Interesting that you should bring this up. Even though Iran did fund Hizbollah, when Iran sent a delegation to Lebanon to ask that the party hand over some western hostages, Hezbollah responded by throwing a handgrenade into the room of the Iranian diplomat.techincally. its well known that iran funds hezbollah and such, so i guess they are... in a way....
Also, what the hell makes you think Iran is so stupid that they would risk to send a nuke towards Israel. It's really nonsensical. I remember president Chirac saying; "where would this missile go to? Before it'd reached 100 metres into the sky Tehran would be a big pile of rubble". What's this fear coming from? Does the US have a right to control everything every nation is doing?
It's pretty much sickening how the foreign policy of the United States works. Back in 2001 Iran, under the leadership of Mohammad Khatami, supplied the United States with information on the Taliban. In 2003 Khatami actually sent a letter to president Bush with a list of unresolved problems between Iran and the United States? And what happened?
The US didn't respond. They had bombed Afghanistan and Iraq to hell and they probably expected Iran would be next.
This space intentionally left blank.
i repeat:
you cannot leave something like this up to chance. fanaticism can make you do nonsensical things.
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
According to the CFR, Hamas and Hezbollah both receive extensive support from Iran. It isn't any kind of a secret.
Who says that it would go in missile form? Perhaps it would be smuggled in with a terrorist organization to be detonated in Israel. Who knows?Also, what the hell makes you think Iran is so stupid that they would risk to send a nuke towards Israel. It's really nonsensical. I remember president Chirac saying; "where would this missile go to? Before it'd reached 100 metres into the sky Tehran would be a big pile of rubble". What's this fear coming from?
I'll let someone else respond rather than evoking the standard anti-American chorus from the left. But in short form, the standard "they have the right to have nukes, leave them alone" argument is absurd. Firstly, why would be allow another nation to have nuclear bombs? Secondly, why would we allow an unfriendly nation to have nuclear bombs? We shouldn't, and it is laughable to suggest otherwise.Does the US have a right to control everything every nation is doing?
It's pretty much sickening how the foreign policy of the United States works.![]()
As stated previously, they hold public military parades where ballistic missiles are daubed with phrases like "death to israel", at a time when they are pursuing a nuclear weapons program. That alone is all i need to know that iran cannot be trusted with nukes and to cheer on anyone who goes about halting that ambition.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Bookmarks