Modesty patch

**Germaan** · 02-28-2009, 21:58

I used because i do not think they really where naked. It seems to me if i have to fight naked it is to much off a disadvantage. Even so ,if they did do it ,after the first time with a lot off causality's they also will never try-ed it again.
This is only my idea not historically backed up.

**Mediolanicus** · 02-28-2009, 22:19

Originally Posted by Germaan

I used because i do not think they really where naked. It seems to me if i have to fight naked it is to much off a disadvantage. Even so ,if they did do it ,after the first time with a lot off causality's they also will never try-ed it again.
This is only my idea not historically backed up.

I don't think they had anymore disadvantage than any other unarmored warrior... They had even an advantage over the common unarmored warrior. Real-live warrior brave enough to charge naked would be quite an unsettling sight. It would also be an insult to you. So you would be angrier and thus less prudent and scared at the same time.

Just wearing a loin cloth would not have given much more protection either... since you seem to suggest that...

**Subotan** · 02-28-2009, 23:38

Plus, they got wasted before hand, so it's not like they felt anything.

**lobf** · 03-01-2009, 09:31

Originally Posted by Subotan

Plus, they got wasted before hand, so it's not like they felt anything.

**Cute Wolf** · 03-01-2009, 19:07

I only used that when I play EB in my Notebook in my home... (as my mum usually see what I play on the Comp)... When I play that on my desktop (I schooled in different city than my hometown), or in my laboratory... I don't use that....

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

**Subotan** · 03-01-2009, 19:35

Originally Posted by lobf

What? They didn't get wasted on various herbs, leaves and good old fashioned booze before charging at the enemy?I find it hard that a man could have a javelin impaled in his chest, remain standing and throw it back by sheer force of will.