Results 1 to 30 of 44

Thread: Russia > France

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Russia > France

    I was going to play as France but I don't think so now. I think that Russia has arguably the best unit roster in the game, along with a great starting position.

    I'm working with a unit of Cossacks on each flank, with some cavalry to their outside. In the middle, slightly in front I'm putting my light infantry. Behind them, I'm stacking line infantry and then in the rear of them, ready to hit wherever is needed - I have my Dragoons. General goes in the rear of all of these, protected.

    This is of course with early unit rosters...but the moral of Russia combined with her starting provinces and roster = arguably the best in the game at first glance.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Russia > France

    yea, but russia also has one of, if not the worst line infantry stats.

  3. #3
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Russia > France

    the cossacks have better range and gun skills, also cheaper upkeep. They just lose out in melee.
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  4. #4

    Default Re: Russia > France

    savoy > france in my campaign lawl
    "How come i cant make friends like that"
    "You need to get out more"
    "Im in another galaxy, how much more out can i get"

  5. #5
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Russia > France

    France unit roster is completely lacking, but then, most factions' unit rosters are actually lacking. Hope someone will be working on a realism mod soon.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Russia > France

    Uhh how are rosters lacking, you want them to invent units?

    There were guns, cannon, grenades and horse. and thats what we get, without over reaching for obscure or romantic unit types like they have in the past

    The units are fine.
    And when the brazen cry of achilles
    Was heard among the trojans, all their hearts
    Were troubled, and the full-maned horses whirled
    The chariots backward, knowing griefs at hand...

  7. #7
    Senior Member Senior Member Graphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Nevada, U.S.
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Re : Russia > France

    Quote Originally Posted by Meneldil View Post
    France unit roster is completely lacking, but then, most factions' unit rosters are actually lacking. Hope someone will be working on a realism mod soon.
    Excuse the horrific spelling...

    Chasseurs a Pied, Regiments Estrangers, Infanterie Petit-Veux, Gendarmie, Courours de Bois, Tiralleurs, Royal Ecossois, Maison du Roi, Chasseurs de Cheval, Chevaux-Legers, Garde du Corps...this is not counting colonial and native units.

    No offense but maybe you should actually check their roster in the custom battle menu, or play more than 3 turns with them in the campaign.

  8. #8
    ex Lord Member Melvish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In a chair
    Posts
    108

    Default Re: Russia > France

    Quote Originally Posted by knoddy View Post
    savoy > france in my campaign lawl
    I Gest Savoy got opportunistic in that war of French succession.
    I did not find French unit roster to bad, maybe not 100% historical correct but still a good range of unit and cavalries. Line infantry , grenadier and skirmisher is on par with UK, good navy, and better cavalries than UK. Remember that France only get superior army only after Napoleonic reform (like the uber French-Polish heavy-lancers and Napoleonic square infantry)
    I destroy my enemies when I make them my friends. ---Abraham Lincoln

  9. #9
    Member Member MadKow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    187

    Default Re: Russia > France

    Quote Originally Posted by ArtillerySmoke View Post
    I was going to play as France but I don't think so now. I think that Russia has arguably the best unit roster in the game, along with a great starting position.
    Back in another Total War forum there is a thread on how bad the Russian line infantry is in the game. This concerns mainly the accuracy (35) not being compensated at least with a bonus to melee, since it seems they relied a lot on the bayonet. So maybe they should have better melee attack or defense.
    I'm at my work place so i can't really check the numbers.

    Hmm... If the game allowed it, it might make sense to have different morale depending on if they were exchanging shots or choosing steel over lead.

  10. #10
    Member Member Oleander Ardens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,007

    Default Re: Russia > France

    Of course the valiant actions of 26000 Germans, 24000 British and 17000 Dutch held back the French onslaught and allowed the 50000 Prussian to enter combat and win the day.

    I think it is very hard to sum up the typical line infantry of a country with a couple of numbers. Sometimes the very same regiment would have heroic defenses and rapid routs in their track record. Said that I hope that the game is balanced for the MP and not too far from history. For example give Russian line regiments bad accuracy but a bit higher defense/morale and/or lower upkeep (less powder used in the training). I really hope that there will be an EB for ETW.
    Last edited by Oleander Ardens; 03-10-2009 at 19:54.
    "Silent enim leges inter arma - For among arms, the laws fall mute"
    Cicero, Pro Milone

  11. #11

    Default Re: Russia > France

    After further review: I see France's power. It lies in the later game...

    Their infantry seems to have the highest moral in the game, and they have a very nice cavalry and artillery lineup.

    Britain is great...but I would pick France over Britain for a campaign (very well might).

  12. #12
    Member Member geala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    465

    Default Re: Russia > France

    Does this really matter? You would win with every faction, wouldn't you?

    By the way, if you mention France. France seems to be sometimes one of the most underestimated powers in the 1700's. Before about 1750 they were the model for many European armies (after that Prussia was for some time but never the British, I'm sorry ). They started the century with a big war in a small coalition against a big coalition and were, despite they lost 3 of the 4 major battles, more or less victorious in the end. Not bad. They ended the century in wars alone against some or many of the other bigger powers in Europe relatively victoriously and conquered great parts of Europe shortly after 1800. Not too bad, too (in a military, not a moral sense). France lost great parts of her colonies because of mismanagement and low interest, not because of the military genius of the others. In North America the French often fought against far superior British and Colonial troops and won (before Quebec).

    Yes, France might be a good faction to play with.
    Last edited by geala; 03-11-2009 at 15:10.
    The queen commands and we'll obey
    Over the Hills and far away.
    (perhaps from an English Traditional, about 1700 AD)

    Drum, Kinder, seid lustig und allesamt bereit:
    Auf, Ansbach-Dragoner! Auf, Ansbach-Bayreuth!
    (later chorus -containing a wrong regimental name for the Bayreuth-Dragoner (DR Nr. 5) - of the "Hohenfriedberger Marsch", reminiscense of a battle in 1745 AD, to the music perhaps of an earlier cuirassier march)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO