Kadagar, the reason I am more and more reluctant to respond to your posts is because unlike Lemur, you seem content to just parse my posts and be disagreeable in any way possible and throw in little snide comments that I don't care to respond to.
Fair enough, I am happy if you just answer the posts in a scientific way, no flames needed. That ok mate?

For example, why the heck did you bring up a dictionary to dispute what I meant by naturalism? For petessake the context is pretty darn clear. We obviously aren't talking about literature or art...
I really had never heard about naturalism used in that context before, and I wanted to make sure I didnt get you wrong. "Naturalism" is a very vague word indeed.

Do statements like these even dignify a response?
I would hope so! I am sorry, but being raised as an agnostic and educated in a world where facts matters, I struggle to understand the perspective of people led by a one-thousand-nine-hundred-fifty year-old book says.

Oh, and that is me being positive. If we go by the last edition of the bible it is much younger than that, as the church leaders of that time realised the original writing really wasnt enough to convince the masses.

You're just throwing snide comments and making really oversimplified strawmen. It's just boring to be honest, I don't see the need to waste my time.
Don't get me wrong. I do assault your arguments but not you as a person. Heck, come over to the alps and I'll buy you a beer or two!

I will never ever tolerate people with a religious mindset who cant back their mindset up with a proof or two. It does not, however, mean I am against those individuals, I am against their arguments.

Do you want to challenge me about religion?

Say I believe the world is run by "pink invisible unicorns".

Prove me wrong, please.

Now, all that is needed to believe in pink invisible unicorns is a bit of faith... much the same as believing in god.

If YOU prove pink invisible unicorns does not exist, I might start to give you some credit for whatever "god's" existance.

If you can not prove that pink invisible unicorns does not exist, can we please keep this topic on a scientific level?