All right, let's grant the premise that due to their behavioral staticness, both Beskar and Atpg may not have a great case on them. Who should we lynch then?
The other choices seem unsatisfactory to me at least. AVSM forgets to unvote, a very forgivable mistake given that it wasn't really made explicit until now.
YLC is selling his vote. Why should this be considered bad? I consider it good. YLC is making the game more interesting and fun, the real purpose of the game, we shouldn't crucify those who do so. He has not done anything bad, and all his transactions are out in the open. He is an honest businessman as he says, until proven otherwise. For the concerns of power swinging, at the moment, one vote isn't going to do anything anyway.
And DJgingivitis is also not one I'd go after. For all his picking on YLC, I believe his "neutral" comment was misinterpreted. I think gingivitis meant to say that we don't really know YLC's alignment, like we don't [I]really/I] know anyone else's but ours and maybe the killed people.
The way I see it, I'd rather have had Atpg and Beskar lynched the first two rounds, two players with some suspicion their way, than FactionHeir and Beefy which were really nothing more than random lynchings.![]()
Bookmarks