Miotas?

[Rhyfelwyr]

I think he got a bit drunk and made some stupid posts.

I've no idea what's going on when it comes to viewing profiles. From what I remember, I never used to be able to access someone's used page whenever they were banned. But now with Miotas, as well as Vuk and MasterPhantom (guy that was recently instaggibed), I can view their profiles, but they appear as a guest and still have the "-" where it should say "member".

I've only noticed this since the site recovered from the recent crashes, maybe that has something to do with it?

[Aemilius Paulus]

I think he got a bit drunk and made some stupid posts.

*facepalm* I know that! Read my previous post carefully! I was trying to protect miotas' prestige/image.

I've no idea what's going on when it comes to viewing profiles. From what I remember, I never used to be able to access someone's used page whenever they were banned. But now with Miotas, as well as Vuk and MasterPhantom (guy that was recently instaggibed), I can view their profiles, but they appear as a guest and still have the "-" where it should say "member".

Vuk put in "-" as his user title, but he still has the "Member" below it. Anyone can do that. Banned people have "-" instead of both the UserTitle and the rank ("member"). Thus, my name would look like this if I was banned:
Aemilius Paulus.....instead of what Vuk has:.......Aemilius Paulus
....... - ..................................................-
...........................................................Member



Hmm, odd, I just checked miotas, and as you said, he is not like Vuk... Before, he used to have that one dash, but now he has a dash andinstead of the UserTitle the rank, e.g. "Member".

[Whacker]

I'd like to propose a total moratorium on these "why did x get banned?" or "please unban y" threads.

[Togakure]

Better yet, make warnings and bans a completely private matter. The rules are posted and clear. Staff has accepted the responsibility of enforcement. Public threads invite pointless unnecessary drama, as we have seen. It's not like such discussions will (or should) have any effect on a decision that has been made. This would effectively eliminate the tactic of trying to influence patrons against the administration by creating a spectacle here in the Tower.

Two koku from an aging katanakaji, sitting with bright eyes and friendly smile under the old Sugi.

[drone]

If I'm not mistaken, the intent of the OP is not to question or complain about miotas' enforced vacation, but a query about the effects on his profile and account. With the recent reboot of the boards, there may be some banhammer aspects that are different than they were before, so I can see this as a valid query.

Of course, that will not stop this thread from turning into a mod witchhunt and spamfest...

[Togakure]

If I'm not mistaken, the intent of the OP is not to question or complain about miotas' enforced vacation, but a query about the effects on his profile and account. With the recent reboot of the boards, there may be some banhammer aspects that are different than they were before, so I can see this as a valid query.

Of course, that will not stop this thread from turning into a mod witchhunt and spamfest...

My post isn't criticizing the OP or his intent. It was triggered by and is related to Whacker's comment.

These are conversations, and conversations are seldom linear. Topics wiggle a bit; it's natural.

[drone]

It was triggered by and is related to Whacker's comment.

As was mine.

[Aemilius Paulus]

If I'm not mistaken, the intent of the OP is not to question or complain about miotas' enforced vacation, but a query about the effects on his profile and account. With the recent reboot of the boards, there may be some banhammer aspects that are different than they were before, so I can see this as a valid query.

Yes, thank you

I am merely asking what happened to him, not why he was banned or that he should be unbanned. Miotas himself took the ban very honourably and did not object to it. What was the duration of his ban though? I am his friend, and he is a bully EB Taverner, so I am not about to ignore his disappearance.

[caravel]

The terms/details of any ban/infraction are between the member in question and the administration. If the member should see fit to make this public then that is his/her decision.