Sorry, but... did you see ala imperatoria and praetorian cavalry in the field?
They can t charge well, haven t ap, they lose in melee also with podromoi and daha riders(!!!), i ve already tested it, they are more expensive too.
Except of armour they are as strong as eqvites romani, then a shit.
So you said: "take this cav in imperial era, cannot spam saggitari(but KH can spam cretans) or prima cohors, 3k limitation"... then imperial army suck after this.
Why you said that take auxilliary cav isn t historically right?
About Marian: yes they are allowed to take those average auxilliary cav, but haven t sagittarii, and 3k limitation again... then also marian suck.
About Polybian: they are actually the best of roman era due to this rules limitations, but they haven t archers, have those heavy infantry limitation and of course the same 3k rule.
Then without chevron, polybian infantry is worse than marian/imperial due to less men and less morale.
About Camillan: they aren t so bad, but low morale and bad armour are the main problems...
However, with this new rules... plus the reforms limitations (that other factions haven t), romani become really hard to playing... more against those extra heavy cav or powerful hellenic army.
It s clear that romani are now really more weak than previous tourney...
But why?
Did you forgot romani team score in last tourney?
It s really necessary to make more weak romani?
You talking about giving elephants to AS... isn t AS already the stronger faction?
Be serious... you can see my point...
Bookmarks