
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
I have been following this case and the "evidence" the prosecution presents is at best ridiculous.
The article quoted above effectively states that they are mercenaries:
Evidence seized recently at the apartment the two men shared in Uganda could play a large role in the eventual outcome of the trial. During the police raid authorities found Norwegian military ID cards, counterfeit United Nations hats, employee ID badges with both the correct and false names of the two men. The employee badges are from a heretofore little known security company named Special Interventions Group (SIG) which is owned by and mostly staffed by Norwegians. [..] However, in previous public interviews Friksen and a staff member identifying himself as “John Hunt” has claimed that SIG has executed offensive combat operations in Africa, including in the DRC. According to Friksen these missions are conducted at the behest of paying clients though he did not disclose whom those clients may have been.
Sounds like it's their bogus story against that of the prosecutor.
The reputation of SIG is not very uplifting, according to the newspaper Aftenposten in 2007:
On the Monday edition of Dokument 2 images from the Norwegian managed security company Special Intervention Group's (SIG) extreme training course will be shown. The company is led by two Norwegians and provides training for Norwegians, Swedes and Danes to become bodyguards in war-torn countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, newspaper Dagbladet reports.
TV 2 has acquired a classified police report on the "specialized security industry" and according to the program SIG is one of the most feared companies in terms of creating potential criminals. The police report claims to have confirmed information that SIG has carried out liquidation assignments in Afghanistan for the American government, but the company rejects the accusation as "nonsense".
Like Louis said, Oslo probably shouldn't go the extra mile for these two backpackers.
Bookmarks