Scary units

**The Celtic Viking** · 08-30-2009, 08:53

What?

**Moros** · 08-30-2009, 13:55

Originally Posted by The Celtic Viking

What?

He doesn't get enough attention probably.

**antisocialmunky** · 08-30-2009, 15:29

Didn't someone mentions that Gaesatae were going to be revised in EBII?

**Moros** · 08-30-2009, 15:35

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

Didn't someone mentions that Gaesatae were going to be revised in EBII?

Of course every single unit is going to be redone from scrap. Both historically as moddelingwise. Actually the unit lists as well. They won't be based on EBI.

**jazstl** · 08-31-2009, 13:52

Some very, very elites may say if he is naked he would be easier to kill....

**antisocialmunky** · 08-31-2009, 14:13

Just because something is naked does not mean it is easily killed. Example: Bears are naked and not particularly easy to kill even when not drugged up to their eyeballs though the latter is much more entertaining.

**athanaric** · 08-31-2009, 16:25

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

Just because something is naked does not mean it is easily killed. Example: Bears are naked and not particularly easy to kill even when not drugged up to their eyeballs though the latter is much more entertaining.

Er... bears usually have a thick fur and are more massive than humans...

**Moros** · 08-31-2009, 16:59

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

Just because something is naked does not mean it is easily killed. Example: Bears are naked and not particularly easy to kill even when not drugged up to their eyeballs though the latter is much more entertaining.

THIS IS CANADA!

Sorry I couldn't help myself.

**lobf** · 08-31-2009, 21:23

Originally Posted by The Celtic Viking

What?

No drugs. No evidence.

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

Didn't someone mentions that Gaesatae were going to be revised in EBII?

Yes.

Edit- Since I got a PM from Ludens, I guess I should make myself clear. This isn't some crusade against the team. Your game is fantastic and deep and intellectual. However, in a few spots, for whatever reason, some theoretical or a-historical content made it into the game.

I don't think there's anyone on the team who still (at least publicly) believes any of the fantastical things added by you-know-who, but unfortunately a lot of the members here today weren't around when these facts were in contention.

If people bothered checking their assertions before posting them, we wouldn't have this issue. But unfortunately a lot of people are content with simply hearing it from someone else. Again, I'm not attacking the team, I'm attacking the lack of intellectual rigor exhibited on the forums.